Untitled

I. KURDADZE, STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS ON CORRELATION BETWEEN ...
2
H. Triepel. Les rapports… p. 89.
3
Àíöèëîòòè Ä. Êóðñ ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðàâà. Ì., 1961. ñòð. 35; Giorgio Gaja. Positivism
and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti – “European Journal of International Law”, vol.3, N1.,
1992.
4
See: U. Scheuner. L’ Influence du droit interne sur la formulation du droit international.
"Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de droit international". T 68 (1939-II) p. 116-117; See
also: G. Dahm. Völkerrecht. Bd I Stutgart 1958, seite 56
5
G. Fitzmaurice, The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint
of the Rule of Law- "Recueil des Cours", the Hague Academy of International Law, T
92 1957, II, p. 68-94.
6
See: Rouseau Ch. Principles de droit intenational public, Paris, 1958, I, p. 369-550.
7
Lasson A. Prinzip und Zukunft des Völkerrecht. Berlin, 1871, p. 402; Zorn A. Gründzuge
des Völkerrechts. Leipzig 1903 I Bid. seite 8-9.
8
See: R. Phillimore. Commentaries upon International Law, VI, London, 1878, $ XXII; T.
Twiss. The Law of Nations, Oxford, 1861; $2; P. Fauchill. Traité de Droit International
Public t. 1 partie 1, Paris, 1992, p. 6-9; Oppenheim. L, International Law, London, 1920; A.
Rivier Le Droit Iinternational (Russion Translation), 1893, Moscow, E. Nys. Le Droit
International. Les principes, les theories le of Aits. Bruxselles 1912.
9
H. Kelsen. General Theory of Law and State. English trans. Wedberg Cambridge Mass.
1949, p. 81.
10
See: H. Kelsen. Principles of International Law, N.Y. 1966, p. 41.
11
G Scelle. Cours de droit international public. Paris, 1948, p. 17.
12
P. Guggenheim. Traité de droit international public. Genéve, 1953, v I, p. 27.
13
Ôåðäðîññ À., Ìåæäóíàðîäíîå ïðàâî. Ì., 1959, p. 50.
14
Shaw N.M. International Law.(Fifth ed). Cambridge Univ. Press. 2004, p. 120-173;
15
M. Shaw. op. cit. p. 123.
16
See: Brownlie Ian. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford University press, 2003
Chap.II The Relation of Municipal and International Law, pp. .31-52.
17
Ibid. p. 52
18
Yean Combacau, Serge Sur. Droit International Public, 5 th.ed, Montchrestien, 2001, p.
181: P. Daillier et A Pellet. Droit international public. L.G.D.J. 2002, p. 95-97; Dominique
Carreau. Droit International.7 th ed. Paris, Pedone, 2001, p. 43-70; Pierre-Moris Dupuy.
Droit international public. Dalloz, 2000, p. 387-389; Michel Virally. Sur un point aux
Anes;les rapports entre droit internetional et droit interne – Me'lange Rolin. Paris. Pedone
1964, p. 497.
19
D. Carreau, op cit., p. 45.
20
D. Carraou, op cit., p. 47; See also: A. B.eramdone. La hierarchie des droits. Paris, 2002, p.
31-32.
21
P-M. Dupuy, op cit., p. 389.
22
P. Daillier et A. Pellet, op cit., p. 97.
23
Áðàâî Ë.Ô., Ïðèìåíåíèå ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðàâà â ïðàâîïîðÿäêå åâðîïåéñêèõ
ñòðàí. "Ðîññèéñêèé" Åæåãîäíèê ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðàâà, Ñàíêò Ïåòåðáóðã,
1995, ñ. 131.
24
Luzius Wildhaber. Wechselspiel zwiscvhen Innen und Aussen: Schweizer Landesrecht,
Rechtsvergleichung, Volkerrecht/ – basel;Frankfurt am Main:Helbing und Lichtenhahn, 1996,
pp. 52 (Reception of International Law into Domestic Law: Comparative European Approaches).
25
A. Cassese, International Law, Oxford University Pres, 2005, p.236-237.
26
An interesting analysis see: Tarja Längström. Transpformation in Russia and International
Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden / Boston, 2003.
27
Ìþëåðñîí Ð.À. Ñîîòíîøåíèå ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî è íàöèîíàëüíîãî ïðàâà. "Ìåæä.
îòíîø". Ì., 1982, ñòð. 10.
28
Ãàâåðäîâñêèé À.Ñ. Èìïëåìåíòàöèÿ íîðì ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðàâà, Êèåâ.1980,
ñòð. 63.
29
Ëåâèí Ä.Á. Îñíîâíûå ïðîáëåìû ìåæäóíàðîäíîãî ïðàâà. Ì.1982, ñòð. 121,
209.
31