Untitled

saerTaSoriso samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2008 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, N1, 2008
2
`saerTaSoriso danaSaulis~ cnebasTan dakavSirebiT ix.: De Than, C.&
Shorts, E. (2003) International Criminal Law and Human Rights, gv.13-14; Kittichaisaree,
K. (2001) International Criminal Law, gv.3-4; Steiner, H.J.& Alston, P.
(ed.) (2000) International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Moral, gv.1132-
38; Cassese, A. (2003) International Criminal Law, gv.23-25.
3
saxelSekrulebo samarTlis venis konvenciis me-2 muxlis me-7 punqtSi
mocemuli definiciis Sesabamisad,.
4
ix.: United Kingdom House of Lords, Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of
Police for the Metropolis and Other (Appellants), Ex Parte Pinochet (Respondent)
(Second Appeal hearing from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench
Division holding that former heads of state are entitled to immunity), House of
Lords, 24 March 1999 [1999] 2 All ER 97, [1999] 2 WLR 827.
5
ix.: Tams, C.J. “Well-Protected Enemies of Mankind”, in The Cambridge Law
Journal (July, 2002) vol.61, part 2, at 246, gv. 246-249.120
6
ix.: O’Neill, K.C. “A New Customary Law of Head of State Immunity: Hirohito and
Pinochet”, in Stanford Journal of International Law (2002), vol. 38, at 289, gv. 314-317.
7
ix.: Bianchi, A. “Immunity Versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case”, in EJIL
(1999), vol.10, No.2, at 237, gv. 254-62.
8
ix., zogadad: Greenwood, C. “Is There a Right of Humanitarian Intervention”,
in The World Today (February 1993) vol. 49, gv. 34-40, (cited from the LSE Course
Pack for LL461); Simma, B. “NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects”,
in EJIL, (1999), vol.10, No.1, gv. 1-22; Kritsiotis, D. “The Kosovo Crisis and NATO’s
Application of Armed Force Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia”, in ICQL
(2000), vol.49(2), at 330; “Kosovo: House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee
4 th Report, June 2000”, in ICLQ (2000), vol.49(4), gv. 876-943.
9
natos Zalebis mier kosovoSi ganxorcielebuli humanitaruli intervenciis
msgavsad.
10
gaerTianebuli erebis organizaciis uSiSroebis sabWos saxiT.
11
ix.: saerTaSoriso samxedro tribunalis wesdeba, me-7 muxli; Soreuli
aRmosavleTis saerTaSoriso samxedro tribunalis wesdeba, me-6 muxli;
yofili iugoslaviisaTvis Seqmnili saerTaSoriso sisxlis samarTlis
tribunalis wesdeba, me-7 muxlis me-2 punqti; ruandisaTvis Seqmnili saer-
TaSoriso sisxlis samarTlis tribunalis wesdeba, me-6 muxlis me-2 punqti;
saerTaSoriso sisxlis samarTlis sasamarTlos damfuZnebeli romis
statuti, 27-e muxli.
12
mag., is, rom sasamarTloebi ukve arseboben da damatebiTi saxsrebis
gamoyofa saWiro ar aris, da a.S.
13
ix.: Smis, S & Van der Borght, K “Belgian Law concerning The Punishment of Grave
Breaches of International Humanitarian Law: A Contested Law with Uncontested
Objectives “in ASIL Insiqhts, (Juli 2003)”.
14
ix., zogadad: Mallory, J.L. “Resolving the Confusion Over Head of State Immunity:
The Defined Rights of Kings”, in Columbia Law Review (1986), vol. 86, at
169, gv.169-71.
15
amasTan dakavSirebiT ix., zogadad: Brohmer, J. (1997) State Immunity and
the Violation of Human Rights, gv. 2-4 & 24-33; Higgins, R. (1994) Problems and
Processes gv. 78-94.
16
ix. me-5 sqolio, zemoT.
17
saerTaSoriso danaSaulis ganmartebasTan dakavSirebiT ix.: Schabas, W.A.
(2001) An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, gv. 21-53.
18
principi par in parem non habet imperium.
19
ix. Falk, R. (1998) Sovereignty and Human Dignity: The Search for Reconciliation,
in Steiner, H.J.& Alston, P. (ed.) (2000) International Human Rights in Context:
Law, Politics, Moral, gv. 581.
20
ix., zogadad: Bröhmer, J. (1997) State Immunity and the Violation of Human
Rights, gv. 14-33; European Convention on State Immunity; Fox, H. (2002) The
Law of State Immunity, gv. 11-64; Lewis, C.J. (1990) State and Diplomatic Immunity,
gv. 7-21; McClanahan, G.V. (1989) Diplomatic Immunity, pp. 27-83; Malanczuk,
P. (1997) Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, gv. 118-123;
O’Neill, K.C. A New Customary Law of Head of State Immunity: Hirohito and
62