Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

California Department of Fish and Game
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Table of Contents
3.5-3 Species Protection Windows. ......................................................3.5-26
3.5-4 Net effect of Action Alternatives on Habitat Types at
the Project Site. ...........................................................................3.5-30
3.7-1 Acreages of Oat Hay Harvested during 2005-2008 in
North Bay Counties........................................................................3.7-6
3.8-1 Upland Game Bird and Waterfowl Hunting Facilities
within 50 Miles of the Project Site................................................3.8-10
3.8-2 Shooting Facilities within 50 Miles of the Project Site..................3.8-11
3.10-1 V/C Ratio, Delay, and Traffic Flow Conditions for LOS
Designations ................................................................................3.10-4
3-10-2 Trip Generation Estimates for Worst-Case Project-
Related Construction Traffic ......................................................3.10-10
3.11-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards Applicable in
California .....................................................................................3.11-3
3.11-2 Federal and State Attainment Status for Sonoma
County .........................................................................................3.11-8
3.11-3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Measured at the
San Rafael Monitoring Station ............................. Follows Page 3.11-8
3.11-4 Thresholds of Significance for Project Operations.....................3.11-16
3.11-5 Maximum Year 1 Emissions from Construction
Activities for the Proposed Project (tons/year)...........................3.11-19
3.11-6 Maximum Year 2 Emissions in tons/year from
Construction Activities for the Proposed Project........................3.11-19
3.11-7 Maximum Year 3 Emissions in tons/year from
Construction Activities for the Proposed Project........................3.11-20
3.11-8 Maximum Year 1 Emissions in tons/year from
Construction Activities for the Full-Tidal Alternative ..................3.11-22
3.11-9 Maximum Year 2 Emissions in tons/year from
Construction Activities for the Full-Tidal Alternative ..................3.11-22
3.11-10 Maximum Year 3 Emissions in tons/year from
Construction Activities for the Full-Tidal Alternative ..................3.11-23
3.12-1 Noise Level Performance Standards ...........................................3.12-4
Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration
Project Final Environmental Impact
Report/Environmental Impact Statement
x
April 2012