09.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

California Department of Fish and Game<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

Chapter 2. Alternatives<br />

In June 2006, SLT learned that the North Coast Railway Authority (NCRA) was<br />

entering into contracts to resume freight service across the site as early as<br />

summer 2007. Services did resume July 13, 2011. Following a subsequent<br />

meeting with SMART representatives, SLT learned that restoration activities<br />

could not interrupt or impede rail service on the line. This new constraint<br />

rendered implementation of the full tidal alternative very difficult due to<br />

exceedingly high design and construction costs in the short-term. Alternative 3<br />

(the Non-Tidal Alternative) was subsequently selected as the preferred project in<br />

the FPRP, in part because it significantly cuts implementation costs over the full<br />

tidal alternative (see Table 2-1). SLT also assumes that rail line activity on the<br />

existing SMART line will not preclude future restoration efforts in the project<br />

area, including any activities that may be undertaken at a later date to restore full<br />

tidal action north of the rail line.<br />

Table 2-1. Preliminary Cost Estimates for FPRP Alternatives 1 and 3<br />

Range<br />

Alternative Low High<br />

Alternative 1—Full-Tidal<br />

Alternative<br />

Alternative 3—No Tidal<br />

Alternative<br />

Source: Wetlands and Water Resources 2007.<br />

Rail Line<br />

Improvement<br />

$ 20,487,804 $ 21,999,823 $ 50,000,000<br />

$ 14,707,262 $ 15,726,724 ---<br />

NEPA/CEQA Alternatives Development<br />

The USFWS and CDFG considered the comments provided during scoping, the<br />

SLT’s development and evaluation of initial alternatives, and the key<br />

environmental impacts of the project to develop a preliminary list of alternatives<br />

for consideration in this EIR/EIS.<br />

• No Action Alternative<br />

• Partial-Tidal Wetland Restoration (Proposed Project) with<br />

Dredging/Breaching Options and Bay Trail Options<br />

• Full-Tidal Wetland Restoration<br />

• Muted-Tidal Wetland Restoration<br />

• Full Equilibrium Dredging Alternative<br />

• Dickson Ranch Alternative<br />

• Bayfront Spur Trail Alternative<br />

• Off-Site Alternative<br />

Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration<br />

Project Final <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong><br />

Report/<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

2-2<br />

April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!