09.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

California Department of Fish and Game<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

Section 3.13. Cultural Resources<br />

Figure 3.13-1). The architectural APE includes the limits of all parcels within the<br />

project area including the power pole alignment (as no structures are located in<br />

Tolay Creek or the breach locations).<br />

Data Sources<br />

Records Search<br />

On September 19, 2007 a Jones & Stokes archaeologist conducted a record<br />

search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) of the California Historical<br />

Resources Information System for the Project area and a 1-mile radius of the<br />

project area. The state’s database of previous studies and known cultural<br />

resources, as well as pertinent historic maps and historical inventories, were<br />

consulted as part of the records search.<br />

Native American Consultation<br />

On October 9, 2007 Jones & Stokes sent out letter to Native American groups<br />

and individuals identified by the Native American Heritage Commission<br />

(NAHC) as having knowledge of the area. No responses have been received to<br />

date Follow-up letters were sent on July 28, 2010 by Tom Origer and Associates<br />

(Tom Origer & Associates 2010b). Responses were received from the NAHC and<br />

Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR), indicating that NAHC has no<br />

information about resources in the immediate project area (NAHC 2010), and<br />

that the FIGR has minimal concerns about the project because of the lack of<br />

known resources and the small amount of soil disturbance (FIGR 2010).<br />

Subsequent to the July 28, 2010 letter, Tom Origer and Associates conducted a<br />

cultural resources assessment for the new power pole alignment and the<br />

perimeter marsh and subtidal habitat in the vicinity of the Connector Channel<br />

(Tom Origer & Associates 2011a). The survey indicated that the power pole area<br />

is unlikely to contain buried cultural resources artifacts, but that there may be<br />

buried remains of the <strong>Sonoma</strong> Valley Rail Road and wharf in the vicinity of the<br />

Connector Channel (Tom Origer & Associates, 2011a); however, an intrusive<br />

survey has not been conducted. USFWS cultural resources experts will also<br />

review the survey. The survey included contacting the NAHC and FIGR (Tom<br />

Origer & Associates 2011b-d). In response to the 2011 Tom Origer and<br />

Associates letter regarding the alternative PG&E power line alignment, FIGR<br />

responded that although they have no knowledge of sacred or ceremonial sites at<br />

this specific location, FIGR would like to begin consultation, and would like<br />

additional information on the depth of soil disturbance and excavation (FIGR<br />

2011). USFWS as the lead federal agency has directly contacted the FIGR, and<br />

FIGR representatives expressed an interest in soil borings of the potentially<br />

affected area (Brubaker, pers. comm. 2012).<br />

Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration<br />

Project Final <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong><br />

Report/<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

3.13-2<br />

April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!