09.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

California Department of Fish and Game<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

Section 3.5. Biological Resources<br />

such conduct.” Harm is defined as “any act that kills or injures the species,<br />

including significant habitat modification.” In addition, Section 9 prohibits<br />

removing, digging up, cutting, and maliciously damaging or destroying federally<br />

listed plants that may occur at sites under federal jurisdiction, such as the Sears<br />

Point project site.<br />

Section 7, Consultation and Authorization of Take. Section 7 of the ESA<br />

provides a means for authorizing take of threatened and endangered species by<br />

federal agencies. It applies to actions that are conducted, permitted, or funded by<br />

a federal agency. Under Section 7, the federal agency conducting, funding, or<br />

permitting an action (the lead agency) must consult with USFWS or NOAA, as<br />

appropriate, to ensure that the proposed action will not jeopardize endangered or<br />

threatened species or destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat. If a<br />

proposed project “may affect” a listed species or designated critical habitat, the<br />

lead agency is required to prepare a biological assessment (BA) evaluating the<br />

nature and severity of the expected effect. In response, USFWS or NOAA issues<br />

a biological opinion (BO) with a determination of one of the following findings.<br />

The proposed action may either:<br />

• jeopardize the continued existence of one or more listed species (jeopardy<br />

finding);<br />

• result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat (adverse<br />

modification finding);<br />

• not jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species (no jeopardy<br />

finding); or<br />

• not result in adverse modification of critical habitat (no adverse modification<br />

finding).<br />

The BO issued by USFWS or NOAA may stipulate discretionary “reasonable<br />

and prudent” conservation measures. If a proposed action under review would<br />

not jeopardize a listed species, USFWS or NOAA would issue an incidental take<br />

statement to authorize the proposed activity.<br />

The USFWS and NOAA Fisheries would complete an internal project review<br />

process pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The outcome of<br />

the Section 7 process will be a Biological Opinion, as discussed above.<br />

Clean Water Act<br />

The federal Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal law protecting the<br />

quality of the nation’s surface waters, including lakes, rivers, and coastal<br />

wetlands. As such, it empowers the United States <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection<br />

Agency (EPA) to set national water quality standards and effluent limitations and<br />

establishes permit review mechanisms to enforce them, operating on the principle<br />

that all discharges into the nation’s waters are unlawful unless specifically<br />

authorized by a permit.<br />

Most of the CWA’s provisions are at least indirectly relevant to the management<br />

and protection of biological resources because of the link between water quality<br />

Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration<br />

Project Final <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong><br />

Report/<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

3.5-3<br />

April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!