09.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

California Department of Fish and Game<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

Section 3.3. Water Quality<br />

Full-Tidal Alternative<br />

The Full-Tidal Alternative includes the construction of a box culvert/bridge for<br />

the SMART rail, and flood protection levees along Reclamation Road and<br />

Highway 37,. and an expanded trail system. This increase in construction<br />

activities would increase the potential for turbidity impacts. However, as above,<br />

most construction will occur prior to levee breaching. and turbidity and<br />

sedimentation cwould increase in the short term until equilibrium is established<br />

in the restored tidal marsh and tidal sloughs. This localized, short-term impact is<br />

considered less than significant because high turbidity is characteristic of the<br />

water in dynamic tidal marsh environments. No mitigation is required.<br />

The potential impacts of dredging the pilot channels and levee breaches include<br />

increased turbidity and suspended sediments comparable to the Project. With<br />

implementation of Mitigation Measure WQ-MM-43, this impact is considered<br />

less than significant.<br />

Conclusion: Less than Significant with Mitigation.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> WQ-6: Degradation of Water Quality due to<br />

Inundation of Formerly Drained Wetlands<br />

Proposed Project<br />

The proposed restoration site would be located on a formerly drained tidal<br />

wetland. The site is therefore likely to contain acid-sulfate soils. Such conditions<br />

could affect the water quality in the created tidal marsh because of resulting low<br />

pH levels. However, because the proposed restoration site was diked and drained<br />

in the 1890’s, it is likely that any sulfuric acid runoff resulting from the<br />

formation of acid-sulfate soils would have occurred over time and would not be<br />

exacerbated by the Project. In addition, sampling results from the adjacent Tolay<br />

Creek restoration project (Takekawa et al. 2002) have indicated that pH readings<br />

at the Project site would be expected to increase over time following breach of<br />

the surrounding perimeter levee. Therefore, breaching of the levees and<br />

restoration of the Sears Point site to natural tidal wetlands accretion processes are<br />

not expected to generate substantial changes in San Pablo Bay water quality<br />

associated with acid-sulfate soils. Water quality indicators, such as pH, are<br />

expected to normalize over time as the wetlands restoration site matures, and<br />

appropriate monitoring will be included in the project monitoring plan. This<br />

impact is considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required.<br />

Conclusion: Less than Significant.<br />

Full-Tidal Alternative<br />

Similar to the Project, breaching the levees and restoration of the Sears Point site<br />

to natural tidal wetlands accretion processes are not expected to generate<br />

Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration<br />

Project Final <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong><br />

Report/<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

3.3-23<br />

April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!