09.01.2015 Views

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

California Department of Fish and Game<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

Chapter 1. Introduction, Purpose, and Need<br />

Bay Trail Plan and <strong>Sonoma</strong> Bay Trail Corridor Plan<br />

ABAG developed the Bay Trail Plan (Association of Bay Area Governments<br />

1989) as a framework for the implementation of the Bay Trail, a continuous<br />

multi-use shoreline trail that would encircle San Francisco Bay. In <strong>Sonoma</strong><br />

County, the alignments that were chosen by ABAG at the time the Plan was<br />

prepared in 1989 primarily followed State Highways 121, 116, and 37, which<br />

raised concerns about safety for future trail users. In 2000, <strong>Sonoma</strong> County<br />

Regional Parks was awarded a planning grant from ABAG to analyze the<br />

feasibility of new trail alignments given the changes in land ownership, use,<br />

population and other factors that have occurred since completion of the 1989 Bay<br />

Trail Plan. The resulting Regional Park study, called the <strong>Sonoma</strong> County Bay<br />

Trail Corridor Plan, consists of seven separate sections of multi-use trail from<br />

Port <strong>Sonoma</strong> in the west to the Napa County line in the east (<strong>Sonoma</strong> County<br />

Regional Parks 2003). Among the alignments considered in the study is “Section<br />

II—Reclamation Road to Tolay Creek,” which crosses the Sears Point property<br />

via the SMART alignment right-of-way, and connects to the Bay Trail segments<br />

currently terminating at <strong>Sonoma</strong> Baylands to the west and Tubbs Island to the<br />

east. The proposed project would comply with the Bay Trail Plan and <strong>Sonoma</strong><br />

Bay Trail Corridor Plan through the extension of the San Francisco Bay Trail.<br />

Public Involvement<br />

Restoration Plan Development<br />

Since 2004, SLT conducted extensive, on-site data collection in support of a<br />

multi-stakeholder driven wetlands and watershed restoration plan, culminating in<br />

the Project. The Project builds upon and refines information presented in the<br />

previously released Conceptual Restoration Plan, Draft Preliminary Restoration<br />

Plan (DPRP), Final Preliminary Restoration Plan (FPRP)—prepared by Wetlands<br />

and Water Resources (2005a, 2006, and 2007)—and several other related<br />

planning efforts.<br />

Beginning in 2004, SLT held the first of several public stakeholder meetings to<br />

review and discuss wetland and watershed restoration scenarios being considered<br />

for the Sears Point property. SLT developed preliminary restoration plans and<br />

presented them to a stakeholder advisory group of over 50 organizations and<br />

individuals, including staff from public agencies, foundations, and conservation<br />

organizations, as well as those who live, work, and recreate in the Sears Point<br />

area. SLT conducted public meetings in September 2004, May 2005, and March<br />

2006. At and following each meeting, SLT received feedback on restoration<br />

scenarios that was then used to refine wetland and watershed restoration<br />

alternatives. SLT also convened a panel of technical experts, referred to as the<br />

Technical Advisory Committee, in December 2005. That panel critiqued project<br />

designs and offered suggestions to improve ecosystem functions in the restored<br />

wetlands and watershed<br />

Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration<br />

Project Final <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong><br />

Report/<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong><br />

1-13<br />

April 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!