Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

More documents

Recommendations

Info

California Department of Fish and Game U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Executive Summary Relationship between Short-Term Uses of the Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity Short-term uses of the environment that would occur with restoration include the impacts on existing wetlands and habitat and those from other constructionrelated activities. However, in the long term, the site is expected to be substantially more productive for habitat and wildlife values. Areas of Controversy During the scoping process, CDFG held a public meeting to introduce interested members of the public to the project and to solicit public input. The meeting was held on October 15, 2007 in conjunction with the publication of NOP. The NEPA scoping period officially began with the publication of the NOI in the Federal Register on January 25, 2008. Prior to publication of the NOI, informal scoping was conducted in conjunction with SLT and CDFG, and a scoping notice was distributed to applicable agencies and members of the public. The public scoping period for this document ended February 28, 2008. Public comments received both at the meeting and in response to the scoping notice for the NOI were recorded for consideration during the restoration planning process. In addition, participants were encouraged to submit written comments to the project sponsors during the public comment period. The scoping process and other consultations undertaken for the proposed project are discussed in Chapter 5, Public Involvement and Scoping. Key issues of public concern regarding the proposed restoration that were identified during the scoping process include the following. • Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit • San Francisco Bay Trail • Black Point Sports Club The Draft EIR/EIS was published on August 28, 2009, and public comments were accepted during the public comment period from August 28, 2009 to October 13, 2009. In addition, a public hearing on the project was held on September 22, 2009. Public comments received at the meeting were recorded and participants were encouraged to submit written comments to the project sponsors during the public comment period. The key issue of public concern regarding the Proposed Project that was identified during the public review process for the Draft EIR/EIS consisted of the fate of the Black Point Sports Club. All public comment (written and oral) that were received during the public comment period are included in Appendix A. Appendix B provides the responses to the public comments. All comments were considered in the preparation of this Final EIR/EIS. Sears Point Wetland and Watershed Restoration Project Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement ES-8 April 2012
Table ES-1. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 142 Impact Significance Determination Mitigation Measure Geology, Soils, and Seismicity No-Action Alternative No Impact Proposed Project/Full-Tidal Alternative Impact GEO-1: Potential Damage to Proposed Facilities Resulting from Strong Seismic Ground Shaking, Liquefaction, or Other Types of Seismic- Related Ground Failure Impact GEO-2: Settlement of Proposed Facilities as a Result of Static Fill Loads on Compressible Substrate Materials Impact GEO-3: Potential for Increased Exposure of Persons or Structures to Landslide Hazards Impact GEO- 4: Potential Short-Term Increase in Erosion and Sedimentation Rates during Construction Impact GEO-5: Contribution to Substantial Loss of Topsoil Impact GEO-6: Potential Damage to Proposed Facilities Resulting from Location on Expansive Soil Impact GEO-7: Potential for Proposed Levee to Damage Adjacent Facilities Less than Significant None Required N/A Less than Significant None Required N/A Less than Significant None Required N/A Less than Significant None Required N/A Less than Significant None Required N/A Less than Significant None Required N/A Less than Significant None Required N/A Impact GEO-8: Damage to Paleontological Resources Significant Mitigation Measure GEO-MM-1: Conduct Preconstruction Survey, Salvage, and Protection Mitigation Measure GEO-MM-2: Notify a Qualified Professional Paleontologist if Remains are Found during Ground- Disturbing Activities Significance Determination with Mitigation Incorporation Less than Significant
Page 1 and 2: Sears Point Wetland and Watershed R
Page 3 and 4: Sears Point Wetland and Watershed R
Page 5 and 6: Contents List of Tables ...........
Page 7 and 8: California Department of Fish and G
Page 23 and 24: Executive Summary This summary prov
Page 29: California Department of Fish and G
Page 33 and 34: Table ES-1. Continued Page 3 of 141
Page 51 and 52: Table 1-1. List of Local, State, an
Page 53 and 54: Table 1-1. Continued Page 3 of 3 Ag
Page 69 and 70: Table 2-2. Action Alternatives Cons
Page 71 and 72: Table 2-2. Continued Page 3 of 4 Ut
Page 81 and 82:
California Department of Fish and G
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 3 Affected Environment and
Page 121 and 122:
Section 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Pal
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Section 3.2 Surface-Water Hydrology
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Section 3.3 Water Quality Introduct
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Section 3.4 Public Health and Safet
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Table 3.5-2. Special-Status Species
Page 225 and 226:
Table 3.5-2. Continued Page 3 of 12
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Section 3.6 Land Use and Public Uti
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Section 3.7 Agricultural Resources
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Section 3.11 Air Quality Introducti
Page 349 and 350:
Table 3.11-1. Ambient Air Quality S
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Table 3.11-32, Continued Page 2 of
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Section 3.12 Noise Introduction Thi
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Section 3.13 Cultural Resources Int
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Section 3.14 Aesthetics Introductio
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Section 3.15 Environmental Justice
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Chapter 4 Consultation and Other Re
Page 425 and 426:
Sonoma Land Trust Chapter 4. Consul
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Chapter 5 Public Involvement and Sc
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Sonoma Land Trust Chapter 7. Refere
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
show all

Environmental Impact Statement - Sonoma Land Trust

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?