Combating Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The annual report to Congress indicates that where there is an Area for CapabilityEnhancement that has no priority for the Department of Energy or for the IntelligenceCommunity, then that organization does not have any effort for that Area of CapabilityEnhancement. The Counter-proliferation Program Review Committee has two subcommittees:* The Counter-proliferation Capabilities Working Group co-chaired by the Joint Staff (J3)and the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Counter-proliferation andChemical and Biological Defense (DASTD(CP/CBD)), which develops and coordinatesDepartment of Defense policy, operational concepts/requirements, and related ProgramOperating Memorandum efforts; and* The Counter-proliferation Intelligence Integration Support Initiative (CPI 2 SP) to establishcritical linkages with the Intelligence Community.• The Nonproliferation and Arms Control Technology Working Group(NPAC TWG), established by Presidential Decision Directive 27, advisesthe Counter-proliferation Program Review Committee on investmentpriorities, reviews Research and Development programs and provides aforum for information exchange.• The Joint Staff’s Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC)assesses and prioritizes Military requirements into the Planning,Programming and Budgeting System cycle; and includes a Joint WarfightingCapabilities Assessment working group on deterrence and counterproliferation.In 1996, the Commanders-in-Chief endorsed a list of 16counter-proliferation “required capabilities”, which they considerednecessary to conduct the counter-proliferation mission from a warfightingperspective. This list currently contains 19 required capabilities and is underperiodic formal review within the Department. The Joint RequirementsOversight Council addresses weapons of mass destruction issues throughrequirements and acquisition and Joint Warfighting CapabilitiesAssessment processes. These processes serve to incorporateCommanders-in-Chief requirements, integrate needs into the ProgramOperating Memorandum and planning cycle, and establish advocacy forcounter-proliferation products. For 1999, the Commanders-in Chief counterproliferationrequirements are shown in the table below.Priority Commanders-in-Chief Counter-proliferation Requirements for 19991 Provide Individual Protection to Forces and Assist Allies/Coalition Partners with Relief from theEffects of NBC2 Intercept the Conventional Delivery of WMD and Control Collateral Effects3 Provide Collective Protection to Forces and Assist Allies/Coalition Partners with relief from theEffects of NBC50
4 Mitigate the Effects of WMD Use5 Detect/Monitor Development, Production, Deployment, Employment of WMD6 Communicate the Ability/Will to Employ Interdiction/Response Capabilities7 Determine Vulnerabilities in WMD Development, Production, Transfer, Deployment, and Employment8 Conduct Off-site Attack to Destroy, Disable, and Deny WMD Targets9 Establish and Maintain Relations with Allies, and Potential Adversaries to DiscourageDevelopment, Production and Use of WMD10 Seize, Destroy, Disable, and Deny Transport of WMD11 Communicate the Ability/Will to Employ Defensive Capabilities12 Determine Vulnerabilities in Decision-Making Processes Related to WMD13 Conduct Information Warfare to Destroy, Disable and Deny WMD14 Support Treaties, Export Controls, And Political/Diplomatic Efforts15 Provide Alternatives to the Pursuit of WMD16 Provide Intelligence Collection Capabilities in Support of USG NP Efforts17 Conduct On-Site Attack to Seize, Destroy, Disable, Deny WMD Targets18 Provide Personnel, Training, Materiel, Equipment, to Support Security Assistance19 Destroy, Disable, and Deny Actor’s Non-WMD Resources and CapabilitiesIt is of particular note that with this year's cycle, this Joint Warfighting CapabilitiesAssessment's prioritized requirements list was also used by some of the other relevantcommittees as a part of their requirements-generation process. The Commissioncommends the Joint Staff's Joint Warfighting Capabilities Assessment working group ondeterrence and counter-proliferation as a positive step in the development of an end-toendplanning process. The extensive effort to collect the Department of Defenserequirements, combine them into an overall priority list, and then integrate the results intospecific operational plans is exemplary. Indeed, this results in a de facto intra-Departmentof Defense coordination mechanism of potentially high value, although it is not yeteffectively replicated throughout the department's broad efforts to combat weapons ofmass destruction proliferation.• The United States Army Nuclear and Chemical Agency (USANCA) is aU.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command organization responsible formaintaining the United States doctrine for the employment of nuclearweapons and for personnel risk and casualty criteria to nuclear weaponseffects. While it is not directly a counter-proliferation organization, much ofits integrated research priorities are directly related to the deterrence,defense and consequence mitigation categories of combating weapons ofmass destruction proliferation. The Army Nuclear and Chemical Agencyhosts an annual review and validation of nuclear research priorities invitingnuclear community experts and users across the Department of Defenseand the Department of Energy to attend. The nuclear weapons effectsresearch is categorized into a number of topical chapters and then into51
Page 1:
CombatingProliferation ofWeapons of
Page 7 and 8:
ContentsExecutive Summary vIntroduc
Page 9:
Executive SummaryEvery American sho
Page 12 and 13:
Similarly, the Commission assessed
Page 14 and 15:
ole as a supplier of ballistic miss
Page 16 and 17:
economic, political, and diplomatic
Page 18 and 19:
Sixth, we must prepare for the thre
Page 20 and 21:
82A (45p x 55p)
Page 22 and 23:
An improved mechanism for White Hou
Page 24 and 25:
esolved before the meetings occur.
Page 26 and 27:
In advising the President and ViceP
Page 28:
Recommendation 2.3: The President s
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 3Managing the Interagency P
Page 33 and 34:
the CPC will need to set program re
Page 35 and 36:
Agency Budget ProcessesRecommendati
Page 37 and 38:
The Persian Gulf War gave vivid war
Page 39 and 40:
One example of poor coordination is
Page 41 and 42:
The lengthy time required for techn
Page 43 and 44:
• facilitating other countries’
Page 45 and 46:
efficiently among the departments,
Page 47:
organizations about proliferation t
Page 50 and 51:
The Proper Role of Export Controls
Page 52 and 53:
Second, many of the countries that
Page 54 and 55:
function is shared as a statutory r
Page 56 and 57:
coherent and effective non-prolifer
Page 58 and 59:
and training opportunities that wil
Page 60 and 61:
The Commission believes this reorga
Page 62 and 63:
Responding to Proliferation that Ha
Page 64 and 65:
Recommendation 5.4: The National Di
Page 66 and 67:
545B (45p x 28p)
Page 68 and 69:
• Second, DoD elements are still
Page 71 and 72:
(3) Maintain the regional responsib
Page 73 and 74:
5C (45p x 33p)61
Page 75 and 76:
and related areas (such as instrume
Page 77 and 78:
Recommendation 5.10: DOE’s prolif
Page 79 and 80:
While there has been considerable p
Page 81 and 82:
Recommendation 5.13: The President
Page 83 and 84:
Recommendation 5.16: The Director o
Page 85 and 86:
own export control system. This eff
Page 87 and 88:
For a variety of reasons, however,
Page 89 and 90:
In theory, all goods leaving or ent
Page 91 and 92:
Committee on Foreign Investment in
Page 93 and 94:
context. The results of this assess
Page 95 and 96:
when grand jury secrecy no longer a
Page 97 and 98:
The FBI’s National Security Divis
Page 99 and 100:
Commission notes that the FBI has i
Page 101 and 102:
Departments of Health and Human Ser
Page 103 and 104:
Department of AgricultureThe Depart
Page 105:
As discussed in Chapter 3, collabor
Page 108 and 109:
SEC. 711. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMISSI
Page 110 and 111:
(C) existing arrangements governing
Page 112 and 113:
serve without compensation in addit
Page 114 and 115:
(a) Extension of Deadline for Submi
Page 116 and 117:
on the Senate Budget and Commerce,
Page 118 and 119:
106
Page 120 and 121:
Richard K. BettsCouncil on Foreign
Page 122 and 123:
William CohenSecretary of DefenseCo
Page 124 and 125:
EWilliam EckertDepartment of StateR
Page 126 and 127:
Thomas GrahamSecond Choice Foundati
Page 128 and 129:
Robert JosephDirector for Counterpr
Page 130 and 131:
Jacob L. LewDirectorOffice of Manag
Page 132 and 133:
Michael MoodiePresidentChemical and
Page 134 and 135:
Paul RobinsonPresident and Laborato
Page 136 and 137:
Owen J. SheaksSpecial AdvisorVerifi
Page 138 and 139:
Bonni G. TischlerAssistant Commissi
Page 140 and 141:
Gillian WoollettAssociate VP for Bi
Page 142 and 143:
7. List and describe the authoritie
Page 144 and 145:
17. What deficiencies and strengths
Page 146 and 147:
Subgroup on Nuclear Export Coordina
Page 148 and 149:
Groups Addressing WMD Accident, Eme
Page 150 and 151:
IAEA Steering CommitteeChair: State
Page 152 and 153:
Title (Legislation that Contains Re
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix G: Resource Allocation—B
Page 161 and 162:
Department of State• NDF• NIS e
Page 163 and 164:
Department of Agriculture• Select
Page 165 and 166:
AbbreviationsAGARSCBRNCDCCFIUSCPDCT
Page 167 and 168:
Appendix H: Technology AcquisitionA
Page 169 and 170:
to change; up-to-date data should b
Page 171 and 172:
this activity: the Materials Protec
Page 173 and 174:
National Goal: Military Action (Inc
Page 175 and 176:
• PE 602715BR: Hard Target Defeat
Page 177 and 178:
• Active defensesTechnology Progr
Page 179 and 180:
that provides an order-of-magnitude
Page 181 and 182:
Additional ViewsAdditional Views of
Page 183 and 184:
The following is a brief outline of
Page 185 and 186: Additional Views of Margo D. B. Car
Page 187 and 188: Annex:Organizational OverviewsExecu
Page 189 and 190: policies through a briefing schedul
Page 191 and 192: The current Senior Director, as wit
Page 193 and 194: Although responsibility for prolife
Page 195 and 196: • the Under Secretary of Defense
Page 197 and 198: Treaty negotiations, U.S. nuclear p
Page 199 and 200: • integrated national policies fo
Page 201 and 202: President with the Prime Minister o
Page 203 and 204: A small secretariat guides the day-
Page 205 and 206: U.S.-Russia Proliferation Issues in
Page 207 and 208: and procedures; assessing competing
Page 209 and 210: Senate, and who is also dual-hatted
Page 211 and 212: Department of StateThe Non-prolifer
Page 213 and 214: (CTBT). The Verification and Compli
Page 215 and 216: The Science Centers are established
Page 217 and 218: Enhancing Export Controls 3Demilita
Page 219 and 220: KazakhstanRussiaStrategic Offensive
Page 221 and 222: UkraineThis assistance is to preven
Page 223 and 224: esource management, and to improve
Page 225 and 226: This expansion will cover the secur
Page 227 and 228: esearch and development in areas su
Page 229 and 230: warfighting plans are developed in
Page 231 and 232: The office of the Assistant Secreta
Page 233 and 234: Directive 5134.9, and is responsibl
Page 235: • The Counter-proliferation Progr
Page 239 and 240: U.S. Army Top Ranked Specific Milit
Page 241 and 242: • The Director, Defense Research
Page 243 and 244: Technology—has primary oversight
Page 245 and 246: • Recommendation 1 to reinforce t
Page 247 and 248: AEC’s successor agencies, the Dep
Page 249 and 250: Components of NN-40 include the Int
Page 251 and 252: ensure excess fissile material no l
Page 253 and 254: X07, 18x24• participate with the
Page 255 and 256: Nuclear Regulatory CommissionBackgr
Page 257 and 258: Office of International Programs. T
Page 259 and 260: The Intelligence CommunityThe Intel
Page 261 and 262: The DCI Nonproliferation Center, un
Page 263 and 264: Findings of the Aspin-Brown and Jer
Page 265 and 266: Department of CommerceThe Bureau of
Page 267 and 268: Office of Exporter Services. In add
Page 269 and 270: The OC weighs the intelligence info
Page 271 and 272: important weapon in BXA’s arsenal
Page 273 and 274: Non-proliferation and Export Contro
Page 275 and 276: The Customs Service’s response to
Page 277 and 278: An additional benefit to the Bureau
Page 279: The Exon-Florio provision does not
show all

Combating Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?