11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONCERNING VEKHI125the leaders <strong>of</strong> a trend against which Vekhi is fighting <strong>to</strong> thedeath. The latter “tirelessly maintained” the very same thingsthat Vekhi stands for <strong>to</strong>day, but “they were unheeded, theintelligentsia passed them by”, declares the preface <strong>to</strong> Vekhi.The reader can already see from this that it is not the“intelligentsia” that Vekhi is attacking. This is only an artificialand misleading manner <strong>of</strong> expression. The attackis being pursued all along the line against democracy, againstthe democratic world outlook. And since it is inconvenientfor the ideological leaders <strong>of</strong> a party that advertises itself as“constitutional” and “democratic” <strong>to</strong> call things by theirtrue names, they have borrowed their terminology from theMoskovskiye Vedomosti. 67 They are not renouncing democracy(what a scandalous libel!) but only “intellectualism”.Belinsky’s letter <strong>to</strong> Gogol, declares Vekhi, is a “lurid andclassical expression <strong>of</strong> intellectualist sentiment” (56). “Thehis<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> our publicist literature, after Belinsky, in thesense <strong>of</strong> an understanding <strong>of</strong> life, is a sheer nightmare” (82).Well, well. The serf peasants’ hostility <strong>to</strong> serfdom is obviouslyan “intellectualist” sentiment. The his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> theprotest and struggle <strong>of</strong> the broadest masses <strong>of</strong> the populationfrom 1861 <strong>to</strong> 1905 against the survivals <strong>of</strong> feudalism throughoutthe whole system <strong>of</strong> Russian life is evidently a “sheernightmare”. Or, perhaps, in the opinion <strong>of</strong> our wise and educatedauthors, Belinsky’s sentiments in the letter <strong>to</strong> Gogoldid not depend on the feelings <strong>of</strong> the serf peasants? The his<strong>to</strong>ry<strong>of</strong> our publicist literature did not depend on the indignation<strong>of</strong> the popular masses against the survivals <strong>of</strong> feudaloppression?Moskovskiye Vedomosti has always tried <strong>to</strong> prove thatRussian democracy, beginning with Belinsky at least, in noway expresses the interests <strong>of</strong> the broadest masses <strong>of</strong> thepopulation in the struggle for the elementary rights <strong>of</strong> thepeople, violated by feudal institutions, but expresses only“intellectualist sentiments”.Vekhi has the same programme as Moskovskiye Vedomostiboth in philosophy and in publicist matters. In philosophy,however, the liberal renegades decided <strong>to</strong> tell the wholetruth, <strong>to</strong> reveal all their programme (war on materialismand the materialist interpretation <strong>of</strong> positivism, res<strong>to</strong>ration<strong>of</strong> mysticism and the mystical world outlook), whereas on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!