11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

420V. I. LENINMar<strong>to</strong>v, <strong>to</strong>o, wrote <strong>of</strong> the sympathy <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie as“the main cause”), in no way prevented the defeat <strong>of</strong> theworkers when the force <strong>of</strong> their onslaught diminished. “Youare strong when society sympathises with you,” the liberalssay <strong>to</strong> the workers. “Society sympathises with you whenyou are strong,” the <strong>Marx</strong>ists say <strong>to</strong> the workers.The last quarter <strong>of</strong> 1905 seems <strong>to</strong> be an exception: althoughit was the period <strong>of</strong> the greatest advance, the workers suffereddefeat. But this is only a seeming exception, for thisperiod again combines the month <strong>of</strong> upsurge in Oc<strong>to</strong>ber,when the workers were vic<strong>to</strong>rious in the economic sphereas well ($57,000, —22,000 strikers won and lost respectively)with the two months <strong>of</strong> November ($25,000, —47,000) andDecember ($12,000, —31,000), when the economic strugglewas on the decline and the workers were defeated. Furthermore,November—a month that was a turning-point,a month <strong>of</strong> the greatest wavering, <strong>of</strong> the most even balancebetween the contending forces, and <strong>of</strong> the greatest uncertaintyas regards <strong>to</strong>tal results and the general trend <strong>of</strong> thefurther his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> Russia as a whole and <strong>of</strong> the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong>the relations between employers and workers in particular—was a month that shows a larger percentage <strong>of</strong> strikesending in compromise than any other month in 1905: <strong>of</strong>179,000 workers involved in economic strikes in that month,106,000, or 59.2 per cent, ended by compromising.*The first quarter <strong>of</strong> 1906 again seems <strong>to</strong> be an exception:the greatest decline in the economic struggle coupled with,proportionately, the largest number <strong>of</strong> workers winning theirstrikes ($34,000, —11,000). But here, <strong>to</strong>o, we have the combination<strong>of</strong> a month in which the workers suffered defeat—namely, January ($4,000, —6,000)—with months in whichthe workers scored vic<strong>to</strong>ries: February ($14,000, —2,000)and March ($<strong>16</strong>,000, —2,500). The number <strong>of</strong> workers involvedin economic strikes is on the decline throughout thisperiod (January, 26,600; February, 23,300; March, 23,200);but there were already clear indications <strong>of</strong> an upward trendin the movement as a whole (the <strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> strikersamounted <strong>to</strong> 190,000 in January, 27,000 in February, and52,000 in March).* The <strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> workers involved in economic strikes wasas follows: Oc<strong>to</strong>ber, 190,000; November, 179,000; December, 61,000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!