11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NOTES OF A PUBLICIST237propose amendments, try <strong>to</strong> convince the comrades, try<strong>to</strong> win a majority in the Party. We may disagree with suchpeople, but their attitude will be a Party attitude, theywill not sow confusion as Yonov, Golos and Co. are doing.Just look at Mr. Potresov.This “Social-Democrat”, in order <strong>to</strong> demonstrate publiclyhis independence from the Social-Democratic Party, exclaimsin Nasha Zarya No. 2, p. 59: “And how numerousthey are, these questions, without the solution <strong>of</strong> which itis impossible <strong>to</strong> move a step, impossible for Russian <strong>Marx</strong>ism<strong>to</strong> become an ideological trend truly investing itselfwith all the energy and power [couldn’t you manage withless rhe<strong>to</strong>ric, dear Mr. Independent!] <strong>of</strong> the revolutionarymood <strong>of</strong> the time! How is the economic development <strong>of</strong>Russia proceeding, what shifting <strong>of</strong> forces is it producingunder the damper <strong>of</strong> the reaction, what is going on in thecountryside and in the <strong>to</strong>wns, what changes is this developmentproducing in the social composition <strong>of</strong> the workingclass <strong>of</strong> Russia, and so on and so forth? Where are the answersor attempts <strong>to</strong> answer these questions, where is the economicschool <strong>of</strong> Russian <strong>Marx</strong>ism? And what has become <strong>of</strong>the play <strong>of</strong> political thought which was once the very life <strong>of</strong>Menshevism? What has become <strong>of</strong> its search for organisationalforms, its analysis <strong>of</strong> the past, its estimation <strong>of</strong> the present?”If this independent were not so fond <strong>of</strong> casting labouredphrases <strong>to</strong> the wind and really thought about what he wassaying, he would notice a very simple thing. If it is truethat a revolutionary <strong>Marx</strong>ist cannot move a step until thesequestions are settled (and it is true), their settlement—notin the sense <strong>of</strong> scientific finality and scientific research but<strong>of</strong> defining what steps have <strong>to</strong> be taken and how—is a matterwith which the Social-Democratic Party must concern itself.For “revolutionary <strong>Marx</strong>ism” outside the Social-DemocraticParty is simply a parlour phrase <strong>of</strong> the legalmindedwindbag who sometimes likes <strong>to</strong> boast that “we<strong>to</strong>o” are almost Social-Democrats. The Social-DemocraticParty gave the first steps <strong>to</strong> an answer <strong>to</strong> these questions,and it was in the resolutions <strong>of</strong> December 1908 that it gavethem.The independents have arranged things for themselvesrather cunningly: in the legal press they beat their breasts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!