11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES OF A PUBLICIST211(on the overcoming <strong>of</strong> liquidationist and otzovist deviations)“in co-operation with the given” Golosists, whocontinue as before and even more crudely <strong>to</strong> defend liquidationism,and with the given Vperyodists, who continue asbefore and even more crudely <strong>to</strong> assert the legitimacy <strong>of</strong>otzovism, ultimatumism, etc.?This question needs only <strong>to</strong> be put for one <strong>to</strong> see howhollow are the eloquent phrases in Trotsky’s resolution,<strong>to</strong> see how in reality they serve <strong>to</strong> defend the very positionheld by Axelrod and Co., and Alexinsky and Co.In the very first words <strong>of</strong> his resolution Trotsky expressedthe full spirit <strong>of</strong> the worst kind <strong>of</strong> conciliation, “conciliation”in inverted commas, <strong>of</strong> a sectarian and philistine conciliation,which deals with the “given persons” and not thegiven line <strong>of</strong> policy, the given spirit, the given ideologicaland political content <strong>of</strong> Party work.It is in this that the enormous difference lies betweenreal partyism, which consists in purging the Party <strong>of</strong> liquidationismand otzovism, and the “conciliation” <strong>of</strong> Trotskyand Co., which actually renders the most faithful service <strong>to</strong>the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs and otzovists, and is therefore an evil thatis all the more dangerous <strong>to</strong> the Party the more cunningly,artfully and rhe<strong>to</strong>rically it cloaks itself with pr<strong>of</strong>essedlypro-Party, pr<strong>of</strong>essedly anti-factional declamations.In point <strong>of</strong> fact, what is it that we have been given asthe task <strong>of</strong> the Party?Is it “given persons, groups and institutions” that wehave been “given” and that have <strong>to</strong> be “reconciled” irrespective<strong>of</strong> their policy, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> theirwork, irrespective <strong>of</strong> their attitude <strong>to</strong>wards liquidationismand otzovism?Or have we been given a Party line, an ideological andpolitical direction and content <strong>of</strong> our entire work, the task<strong>of</strong> purging this work <strong>of</strong> liquidationism and otzovism—atask that must be carried out irrespective <strong>of</strong> “persons,groups and institutions”, in spite <strong>of</strong> the opposition <strong>of</strong> “persons,institutions and groups” which disagree with that policyor do not carry it out?Two views are possible on the meaning <strong>of</strong> and conditionsfor the achievement <strong>of</strong> any kind <strong>of</strong> Party unity. It is extremelyimportant <strong>to</strong> grasp the difference between these

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!