11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222V. I. LENINtionally hands over its property <strong>to</strong> third persons (from theinternational Social-Democratic movement) who will have<strong>to</strong> decide whether this money should be given <strong>to</strong> the CentralCommittee or returned <strong>to</strong> the faction. The character<strong>of</strong> this contract, which would be quite extraordinary andeven impossible in a normal, intact Party, shows clearly onwhat conditions the Bolsheviks accepted the agreement.The declaration <strong>of</strong> the Bolsheviks printed in the CentralOrgan No. 11, says clearly that the main ideological andpolitical condition was the passing <strong>of</strong> the resolution “condemningliquidationism and otzovism and recognising thefight against these trends <strong>to</strong> be an inalienable element <strong>of</strong>FROM MARXTO MAOthe political line <strong>of</strong> the Party”, that one <strong>of</strong> the guaranteesfor the implementation <strong>of</strong> this line was the composition <strong>of</strong>⋆the Central Organ, and that a continuation <strong>of</strong> their factionalorgan and factional policy by the Mensheviks would givethe Bolsheviks the right <strong>to</strong> “demand their money backfrom the trustee”. The Central Committee accepted theseconditions, making direct reference <strong>to</strong> this declaration <strong>of</strong>the Bolsheviks in the resolution on the factional centres.The question is, are these conditions <strong>to</strong> be kept or not?Are these conditions formal or not? Comrade Yonov, speakingdisdainfully <strong>of</strong> “formalities” has not unders<strong>to</strong>od themost elementary distinction NOT FOR between the agreement asthe basis <strong>of</strong> a contract (= the condition that the Bolsheviksshould hand over their money, a condition endorsed by theunanimous resolutionCOMMERCIAL<strong>of</strong> the Central Committee on factionalcentres) and the observance <strong>of</strong> the formal conditions <strong>of</strong> thecontract as the DISTRIBUTIONbasis for the preservation <strong>of</strong> unity.If Comrade Yonov, now, after the unanimous resolution<strong>of</strong> the Central Committee on the factional centres, contemptuouslydismisses “formalities” he is dismissing the wholeresolution <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee on the factional centres.Comrade Yonov’s sophistry amounts <strong>to</strong> the following:the aggregate decisions <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee were reachednot only through the passing <strong>of</strong> resolutions by a majorityvote but also through an agreement between the warringtrends on certain highly important questions—consequently,henceforth <strong>to</strong>o these decisions are not formallybinding and the minority has the right <strong>to</strong> demand an agreement!Since there is an element <strong>of</strong> compromise in the deci-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!