11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES OF A PUBLICIST235them in accordance with their own point <strong>of</strong> view, in accordancewith their own view <strong>of</strong> the experience <strong>of</strong> 1907-10.That would be working for real Party unity, for a rapprochemen<strong>to</strong>n a single line <strong>of</strong> Social-Democratic activity. Byrefusing <strong>to</strong> do so the Golosists are in fact carrying out theprogramme <strong>of</strong> the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs. What, indeed, is the programme<strong>of</strong> the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs on this question? It consists in ignoringthe decisions <strong>of</strong> the underground Party which is doomed<strong>to</strong> perdition, etc., counterposing <strong>to</strong> the decisions <strong>of</strong> theParty the amorphous “work” <strong>of</strong> free lances who call themselvesSocial-Democrats and who have ensconced themselvesin various legal journals, legal societies, etc., cheek byjowl with liberals, Narodniks and Bezzaglavtsi. We donot need any resolutions, any “estimate <strong>of</strong> the situation”,any definition <strong>of</strong> our immediate aims <strong>of</strong> struggle or ourattitude <strong>to</strong> the bourgeois parties—we call all this (followingMilyukov!) the “dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> exclusive undergroundcircles” (without noticing that by our amorphousness, lack<strong>of</strong> organisation and fragmented state we are actually surrenderingthe “dicta<strong>to</strong>rship” <strong>to</strong> the liberal circles!).Yes, yes, there is no doubt that the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs can demandnothing more from the Golosists as regards their attitude<strong>to</strong> Party decisions than that they should deride them contemptuouslyand ignore them.It is impossible <strong>to</strong> discuss seriously the opinion that theresolution <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee on the state <strong>of</strong> affairsin the Party in 1909-10 is “least <strong>of</strong> all” connected with theLondon heritage, because the absurdity <strong>of</strong> this opinionleaps <strong>to</strong> the eye. It is nothing but mockery <strong>of</strong> the Party<strong>to</strong> say: we are prepared <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account its “whole pasthis<strong>to</strong>ry” but not that part <strong>of</strong> it which is directly connectedwith the present, nor the present itself! In other words: weare prepared <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account anything that does notdefine our present actions. We are prepared (in 1910) <strong>to</strong>take in<strong>to</strong> account “the whole past his<strong>to</strong>ry” <strong>of</strong> Social-Democracyexcept the past his<strong>to</strong>ry which contains the resolutionsadopted on the Cadet Party in the years 1907-08-09,on the Trudovik parties in 1907-08-09, on the aims<strong>of</strong> our struggle in 1907-08-09. We are prepared <strong>to</strong>take in<strong>to</strong> account everything except what is essential <strong>to</strong>becoming pro-Party in practice here and now, <strong>to</strong> conduct-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!