11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FACTION OF SUPPORTERS OF OTZOVISM AND GOD-BUILDERS53Our “victims <strong>of</strong> removal” talk <strong>of</strong> “irregularity” becausein their opinion the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board <strong>of</strong> Proletary has noright <strong>to</strong> decide the question <strong>of</strong> the fate <strong>of</strong> the Bolshevikfaction and <strong>of</strong> the split in its ranks. Very well, gentlemen.If the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board <strong>of</strong> Proletary and the 15 Bolshevikmembers and candidate members <strong>of</strong> the Central Committeeelected at the London Congress have not the right <strong>to</strong> representthe Bolshevik faction you have every opportunity <strong>to</strong>make a public declaration <strong>to</strong> that effect and conduct a campaignfor the overthrow <strong>of</strong> these undesirable representativesor for new elections <strong>to</strong> replace them. But you have indeedconducted such a campaign and only after you had met witha certain number <strong>of</strong> reverses did you prefer <strong>to</strong> complain andwhine. If you raised the question <strong>of</strong> a congress or conference<strong>of</strong> Bolsheviks, Comrades Maximov and Nikolayev, thenwhy did you not tell the public that several months agoComrade “Er” submitted a draft resolution <strong>to</strong> the MoscowCommittee calling for a vote <strong>of</strong> no confidence in Proletaryand the holding <strong>of</strong> a Bolshevik conference <strong>to</strong> elect a newideological centre for the Bolsheviks?Why did you keep silent about this, O wrongly removedones?Why did you keep silent about the fact that “Er’s” resolutionwas rejected by every vote except his own?Why did you keep silent about the fact that in theautumn <strong>of</strong> 1908 in the whole St. Petersburg organisationfrom <strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m a struggle was going on over theplatforms <strong>of</strong> the two trends <strong>of</strong> Bolshevism, the otzovistsand the opponents <strong>of</strong> otzovism, and that the otzovists weredefeated?Maximov and Nikolayev want <strong>to</strong> whine <strong>to</strong> the public becausethey have been repeatedly defeated in Russia. Both“Er” and the St. Petersburg otzovists had the right <strong>to</strong> wagea struggle against Bolshevism, in the highest down <strong>to</strong> thelowest organisations, without waiting for any conferenceand without making public their platforms before the wholeParty.But had not the Proletary edi<strong>to</strong>rial board, which declaredopen war on otzovism from June 1908, the right after ayear <strong>of</strong> strife, a year <strong>of</strong> controversy, a year <strong>of</strong> friction, conflict,etc., after it had invited three regional delegates from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!