11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE QUESTION OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES279as the means <strong>of</strong> production remain In the hands <strong>of</strong> the class withoutwhose expropriation socialism cannot be attained;“2) that consumers’ societies are not organisations for directstruggle against capital and exist alongside similar bodies organisedby other classes, which could give rise <strong>to</strong> the illusion that these organisationsare a means by which the social question may be solved withoutclass struggle and the expropriation <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie.“The Congress calls on the workers <strong>of</strong> all countries:“a) <strong>to</strong> join the proletarian consumers’ societies and <strong>to</strong> promotetheir development in every way, at the same time upholding the democraticcharacter <strong>of</strong> these organisations;“b) by untiring socialist propaganda in the consumers’ societies, <strong>to</strong>spread the ideas <strong>of</strong> class struggle and socialism among the workers;“c) <strong>to</strong> strive at the same time <strong>to</strong> bring about the fullest possibleco-operation between all forms <strong>of</strong> the labour movement.“The Congress also points out that producers’ co-operatives canbe <strong>of</strong> importance for the struggle <strong>of</strong> the working class only if they area component part <strong>of</strong> consumers’ societies.”All the draft resolutions were handed <strong>to</strong> a subcommission(the commissions at International Congresses are so large—each nation delegating four representatives <strong>to</strong> each commission—thatit is simply out <strong>of</strong> the question <strong>to</strong> work out thetext <strong>of</strong> resolutions at a full commission meeting). Thissubcommission consisted <strong>of</strong> ten persons; two Belgians(Anseele and Vandervelde), one Frenchman (Jaurès), oneAustrian (Karpeles), one German (Elm), one Dutchman(Wibaut—a <strong>Marx</strong>ist), one Italian, one Dane, one Englishmanand one Russian Social-Democrat (Voinov and myself—our Social-Democratic delegation was unable <strong>to</strong> meet <strong>to</strong>elect a representative—so we both attended and one voted).It was in the subcommission that the real business <strong>of</strong>drawing up the text <strong>of</strong> the resolution <strong>to</strong>ok place. The textadopted by the Congress, except for some small stylisticchanges, is the same as the one drawn up by the subcommission;the reader will find the text <strong>of</strong> the Congress resolutionelsewhere in this issue. The fight in the subcommissioncentred not on the question <strong>of</strong> the relations <strong>of</strong> co-opera<strong>to</strong>rs<strong>to</strong> the Party—as was the case in the commission—but onthe more fundamental question <strong>of</strong> the significance and role<strong>of</strong> co-operative societies. The Belgians tended <strong>to</strong> definetheir role, quite correctly in principle, as one <strong>of</strong> the possible(in certain conditions) auxiliary weapons in the proletarianclass struggle for the “<strong>to</strong>tal expropriation” (expropriationintègrale) <strong>of</strong> the capitalist class. Elm, supported by Jaurès,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!