11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

272V. I. LENINin print in July 1909,* and since then even the most unconcernedand uninformed Social-Democrats have becomeconvinced <strong>of</strong> this fact. The famous “platform” was drawnup abroad by eight intellectuals and seven worker-students.The part played by these workers, who hastily gave theirsignatures <strong>to</strong> the slogans <strong>of</strong> “proletarian philosophy” andrecognition <strong>of</strong> otzovism as a “legitimate shade <strong>of</strong> opinion”is <strong>to</strong>o obvious <strong>to</strong> deserve any further comment. We havehere a clear-cut case <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> a faction by a group<strong>of</strong> literati abroad, who indeed behave like “khans” (Voinov’s114 expression in the Vperyod symposium), for theythemselves are conscious <strong>of</strong> their despotism, concealingfrom the public what is most dear <strong>to</strong> them, i.e., the bourgeoisphilosophy <strong>of</strong> Machism and otzovism. The Vperyodistscry out against “leaders abroad” and at the same time forman organisation which in actual fact is a mere adjunct <strong>to</strong> ahandful <strong>of</strong> literati abroad; they cry out against factionand themselves secretly create a new, petty, lifeless andsectarianly empirio-monistic faction. The political source<strong>of</strong> all this hypocrisy is that the real leaders <strong>of</strong> the factionfind it impossible <strong>to</strong> come out openly and directly in favour<strong>of</strong> the things that are really dear <strong>to</strong> them.We shall confine ourselves <strong>to</strong> two particularly glaringexamples <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy. On page 53 <strong>of</strong> the symposium,Rabochy Ar. declares that the Bureau <strong>of</strong> the Central Committeein Russia “is not doing a damned thing” (these words<strong>of</strong> course are ascribed <strong>to</strong> a “<strong>Lenin</strong>ist” worker who is alleged<strong>to</strong> have agitated the “Vperyodist” in this strain. Oh, thenaïve cunning <strong>of</strong> “Rabochy Ar.”!) and that the Vperyodist(again with the “<strong>Lenin</strong>ist” and, <strong>of</strong> course, on his instigation)proposed that the “Moscow organisation be declared independent<strong>of</strong> the Russian Central Committee and no longersubordinate <strong>to</strong> its instructions”.Beginning with January 1910 the Bureau <strong>of</strong> the RussianCentral Committee worked hard <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re the centralorganisation in spite <strong>of</strong> the opposition both <strong>of</strong> the Golosistliquida<strong>to</strong>rs (the famous Mikhail, Roman and Yuri incident)and <strong>of</strong> the Vperyodists (who at this time were buildingtheir own little faction from abroad against the Central* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 15, pp. 450-51.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!