11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158V. I. LENINParty. On the contrary, they are being called back <strong>to</strong> theParty on the definitely expressed condition that they breakwith liquidationism (i.e., legalism at all costs) and comeover <strong>to</strong> the Party standpoint, <strong>to</strong> the “Party way <strong>of</strong> life”. TheCentral Committee’s letter on the conference, this <strong>of</strong>ficialcommentary on the resolutions <strong>of</strong> the plenum, one whichis absolutely binding on the Party, says with the utmostclarity that it is the illegal organisations* that must judgewhether the legalists are in actual fact pro-Party, i.e., itspecifically rejects the “theory <strong>of</strong> equality”!By a specific decision <strong>of</strong> the plenum this letter <strong>of</strong> theCentral Committee was drawn up by a special committeeconsisting <strong>of</strong> Comrades Grigory, 79 Innokenty 80 and Mar<strong>to</strong>v.The letter was endorsed unanimously by the whole <strong>of</strong> thiscommittee. Now Comrade Mar<strong>to</strong>v, as if inspired by someevil spirit, performs a volte-face, writes an article whollyimbued with a directly opposite theory, and in additioncomplains, as if in mockery <strong>of</strong> the Party, when this articleis declared controversial!It is quite obvious that this theory <strong>of</strong> equality, which isexpressed in all the other articles <strong>of</strong> Golos still more sharplyand crudely than in the case <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>to</strong>v, leads in fact <strong>to</strong> theParty being subordinated <strong>to</strong> the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs, for the legalistwho sets himself against the illegal Party, considering himselfon a par with it, is nothing but a liquida<strong>to</strong>r. The “equality”between an illegal Social-Democrat who is persecutedby the police and a legalist who is safeguarded by his legalityand his divorce from the Party is in fact the “equality”between the worker and the capitalist.All this is so apparent, Golos’s contemptuous treatment <strong>of</strong>the decision <strong>of</strong> the plenum and <strong>of</strong> the explanation <strong>of</strong> thisdecision in the Central Committee’s letter is so obvious,that Mar<strong>to</strong>v’s article can only be called one that points* See No. 11 <strong>of</strong> the Central Organ, pp. 11-12: “Only the local organisationscan ensure that this additional representation is extendedsolely <strong>to</strong> real (the “Letter’s” italics) pro-Party elements; our localworkers will judge not only by the words <strong>of</strong> these leaders <strong>of</strong> the legalmovement, but also by their deeds, and will exert every effort so tha<strong>to</strong>nly those are drawn in who in essence are even now part <strong>of</strong> our Party,who wish <strong>to</strong> join our Party organisation in order really <strong>to</strong> work init, <strong>to</strong> strengthen it, <strong>to</strong> subordinate themselves <strong>to</strong> it and serve it”, etc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!