11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52V. I. LENINfrom Plekhanov, you can imagine, reader, what tears<strong>of</strong> sympathy for Maximov will be shed by the philistineelements inside and on the fringe <strong>of</strong> the Social-Democraticmovement over the “ousting” and “removal” <strong>of</strong>the virtuous, well-meaning and modest otzovists andgod-builders.The question <strong>of</strong> this “ousting” and “removal” is treatedby Comrade Maximov both from its formal aspect andwith regard <strong>to</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong> the matter. Let us examinethis treatment.<strong>From</strong> the formal point <strong>of</strong> view the removal <strong>of</strong> Maximovwas “irregular”, say the removed ones, and “we do not recognisethis removal”, for Maximov was “elected by the Bolshevikcongress, i.e., the Bolshevik section <strong>of</strong> the PartyCongress”. Reading Maximov and Nikolayev’s leaflet, thepublic sees a grave accusation (“irregular removal”) withoutbeing given either an exact formulation <strong>of</strong> it or materialfrom which <strong>to</strong> judge the matter. But that is the invariablemethod <strong>of</strong> a certain side during splits abroad: <strong>to</strong> obscurethe divergence <strong>of</strong> principle, <strong>to</strong> draw a veil over it, <strong>to</strong> keepsilent about the ideological dissensions, <strong>to</strong> conceal theirideological friends, and <strong>to</strong> make as much noise as possibleabout organisational conflicts, which the public is not ina position <strong>to</strong> analyse exactly and has not the right <strong>to</strong> sort outin detail. That was how the Rabocheye Dyelo-ists behavedin 1899, with their outcry that there was no Economismin any shape or form, but that Plekhanov had s<strong>to</strong>len thepress. That was how the Mensheviks behaved in 1903 withtheir outcry that they had made no turn whatsoever <strong>to</strong>Rabocheye Dyelo-ism but that <strong>Lenin</strong> had “ousted” or “removed”Potresov, Axelrod and Zasulich, etc. That is the behaviour<strong>of</strong> people who are speculating on elements abroad whoare fond <strong>of</strong> rows and sensations. There is no otzovism, norany god-building, but there is the “irregular removal” <strong>of</strong> Maximov“by the majority <strong>of</strong> the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board”, who want <strong>to</strong>“leave at their full disposal” “the property <strong>of</strong> the whole faction”—comein<strong>to</strong> the shop, gentlemen, we will tell you somethingmost spicy about this business....An old device, Comrades Maximov and Nikolayev! Andthe politicians who resort <strong>to</strong> it are bound <strong>to</strong> break theirnecks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!