11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

412V. I. LENINboth <strong>of</strong> them from the January and May waves in 1905 (<strong>of</strong>which the first was also stronger than the second) is that theycame during the ebb <strong>of</strong> the movement, whereas the first twowaves <strong>to</strong>ok place during the rising tide <strong>of</strong> the movement.This distinction is generally characteristic <strong>of</strong> the two lastyears compared with the first year <strong>of</strong> the triennium. Hence,the correct explanation <strong>of</strong> the increase registered during theseperiods <strong>of</strong> 1906 and 1907 is that they denote a halt in theretreat and an attempt on the part <strong>of</strong> the retreating forces<strong>to</strong> resume the <strong>of</strong>fensive. Such is the objective meaning<strong>of</strong> these upsurges, which is now clear <strong>to</strong> us in the light<strong>of</strong> the final results <strong>of</strong> the whole “three-year period <strong>of</strong>s<strong>to</strong>rm and stress”. The First and the Second Dumas representednothing else than political negotiations and politicaldemonstrations on <strong>to</strong>p, prompted by the halt in theretreat below.This clearly shows how short-sighted are the liberals whosee in these negotiations something self-sufficient and independent,unrelated <strong>to</strong> whether a particular halt in the retreatis going <strong>to</strong> be <strong>of</strong> long duration, or what its outcome willbe. This also shows clearly the objective dependence on theliberals <strong>of</strong> those liquida<strong>to</strong>rs who, like Mar<strong>to</strong>v, now speakwith scorn <strong>of</strong> the “expectations <strong>of</strong> the romanticists” duringthe period <strong>of</strong> retreat. The statistical data show that it wasnot a question <strong>of</strong> the “expectations <strong>of</strong> the romanticists”, but<strong>of</strong> actual interruptions, halts <strong>of</strong> the retreat. Had it not beenfor these halts, the coup d’état <strong>of</strong> June 3, 1907, which washis<strong>to</strong>rically absolutely inevitable since the retreat was afact, would have taken place sooner, perhaps a year or evenmore than a year earlier.Now that we have examined the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the strikemovement in its relation <strong>to</strong> the principal moments <strong>of</strong>the political his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the period, let us pass on <strong>to</strong> aninvestigation <strong>of</strong> the interrelation between the economicand the political strikes. The <strong>of</strong>ficial statistics providevery interesting data <strong>to</strong>uching on this subject. Let us firstdeal with the general <strong>to</strong>tal for each <strong>of</strong> the three yearsunder review:causes <strong>of</strong> the summer increase in the number <strong>of</strong> strikes in Russia.One has only <strong>to</strong> glance at the figures showing the number <strong>of</strong> workersengaged in political strikes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!