11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268THE VPERYOD FACTIONThe Vperyod group has published in Paris a “symposium<strong>of</strong> articles on current questions” entitled Vperyod. Togetherwith Comrade Sazhin’s 111 pamphlet (On the Question <strong>of</strong>the Regeneration <strong>of</strong> the Party), which was “published byprivate donation” and is obtainable through the edi<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong>the symposium Vperyod, and the separate leaflet issuedover the signature <strong>of</strong> the Vperyod group and the platform<strong>of</strong> this group, the Party has now more than sufficient materialby which <strong>to</strong> judge the Vperyodists.The platform <strong>of</strong> the Vperyodists is characterised by thefollowing three features. Firstly: <strong>of</strong> all the groups andfactions within our Party it has been the first <strong>to</strong> give prominence<strong>to</strong> philosophy and that under cover <strong>of</strong> a pseudonym.“Proletarian culture”, “proletarian philosophy”—these arethe words used in the platform. They are a pseudonym forMachism, i.e., a defence <strong>of</strong> philosophical idealism undervarious garbs (empirio-criticism, empirio-monism, etc.).Secondly: in the political sphere the group has declaredotzovism “a legitimate shade <strong>of</strong> opinion” and reported thatsome otzovists, members <strong>of</strong> this group, disagreed with thedefinition <strong>of</strong> the Party’s tasks in regard <strong>to</strong> the State Duma.The definition itself given in the Vperyod platform is sounclear and confused that it can only be described as anadaptation <strong>to</strong> the otzovist ideology. Thirdly, and lastly,the platform emphatically condemned factionalism anddemanded the unification <strong>of</strong> factions, their coalition in<strong>to</strong>one party.And so we have as a result—if we begin from the end—one very good aspiration and two screens on the part <strong>of</strong>very bad ideological and political trends which stand for abreak with <strong>Marx</strong>ism and the subordination <strong>of</strong> the proletariat

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!