11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACTION OF SUPPORTERS OF OTZOVISM AND GOD-BUILDERS33There you have the best justification <strong>of</strong> the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board<strong>of</strong> Proletary, why it had <strong>to</strong> remove political leaders whospread such ideas among the masses.Get this in<strong>to</strong> your heads, O unjustly removed ones: whenthe conditions <strong>of</strong> acute and increasing reaction are reallypresent, when the mechanical force <strong>of</strong> this reaction reallysevers the connection with the masses, makes sufficientlybroad work difficult and weakens the Party, it is then thatthe specific task <strong>of</strong> the Party becomes <strong>to</strong> master the parliamentaryweapon <strong>of</strong> struggle; and that, O unjustly removedones, is not because parliamentary struggle is higher thanany other forms <strong>of</strong> struggle; no, it is just because it is lowerthan them, lower, for example, than a struggle which drawsin<strong>to</strong> the mass movement even the armed forces, which givesrise <strong>to</strong> mass strikes, uprisings, etc. Then why does mastery<strong>of</strong> the lowest form <strong>of</strong> struggle become the specific (i.e., distinguishingthe present moment from other moments) task <strong>of</strong>the Party? Because the stronger the mechanical force <strong>of</strong> reactionand the weaker the connection with the masses, themore immediate becomes the task <strong>of</strong> preparing the minds <strong>of</strong> themasses (and not the task <strong>of</strong> direct action), the more immediatebecomes the task <strong>of</strong> utilising the methods <strong>of</strong> propagandaand agitation created by the old regime (and not a direc<strong>to</strong>nslaught <strong>of</strong> the masses against this old regime).IIFor any <strong>Marx</strong>ist who has at all pondered over the philosophy<strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong> and Engels, for any Social-Democrat who isat all acquainted with the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the international socialistmovement, this conversion <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the lowest forms <strong>of</strong>struggle in<strong>to</strong> the specific weapon <strong>of</strong> struggle <strong>of</strong> a specialhis<strong>to</strong>ric moment contains nothing surprising. The anarchistshave absolutely never been able <strong>to</strong> understand this simplething. Now our otzovists and their removed echoers aretrying <strong>to</strong> introduce anarchist modes <strong>of</strong> thought amongRussian Social-Democrats, crying out (like Maximov andCo.) that Proletary is dominated by the theory <strong>of</strong> “parliamentarismat any price”.To show how stupid and un-Social-Democratic these outcries<strong>of</strong> Maximov and Co. are, we shall once more have <strong>to</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!