11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206V. I. LENIN<strong>16</strong>, 20, 21). It is common knowledge that even outrigh<strong>to</strong>pponents <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>ism lay claim <strong>to</strong> this latter term in Russia.In the second place, if the task <strong>of</strong> developing “proletarianscience” is introduced in the platform, it is necessary <strong>to</strong>state plainly just what ideological and theoretical struggle<strong>of</strong> our day is meant here and whose side the authors <strong>of</strong> theplatform take. Silence on this point is a naïve subterfuge,for the essence <strong>of</strong> the matter is obvious <strong>to</strong> everyone who isacquainted with the Social-Democratic literature <strong>of</strong> 1908-09.In our day a struggle between the <strong>Marx</strong>ists and the Machistshas come <strong>to</strong> the fore and is being waged in the domain<strong>of</strong> science, philosophy and art. It is ridiculous, <strong>to</strong> say theleast, <strong>to</strong> shut one’s eyes <strong>to</strong> this commonly known fact.“Platforms” should be written not in order <strong>to</strong> gloss overdifferences but in order <strong>to</strong> explain them.Our authors clumsily give themselves away by the abovequotedpassage <strong>of</strong> the platform. Everyone knows thatit is Machism that is in fact implied by the term “proletarianphilosophy”—and every intelligent Social-Democrat willat once decipher the “new” pseudonym. There was no pointin inventing this pseudonym, no point in trying <strong>to</strong> hidebehind it. In actual fact, the most influential literary nucleus<strong>of</strong> the new group is Machist, and it regards non-Machistphilosophy as non-“proletarian”.Had they wanted <strong>to</strong> speak <strong>of</strong> it in the platform, theyshould have said: the new group unites those who willfight against non-”proletarian”, i.e., non-Machist, theoriesin philosophy and art. That would have been a straightforward,truthful and open declaration <strong>of</strong> a well-knownideological trend, an open challenge <strong>to</strong> the other tendencies.When an ideological struggle is held <strong>to</strong> be <strong>of</strong> great importancefor the Party, one does not hide but comes out with an opendeclaration <strong>of</strong> war.And we shall call upon everyone <strong>to</strong> give a definite andclear answer <strong>to</strong> the platform’s veiled declaration <strong>of</strong> a philosophicalstruggle against <strong>Marx</strong>ism. In reality, all thephraseology about “proletarian culture” is just a screen forthe struggle against <strong>Marx</strong>ism. The “original” feature <strong>of</strong>the new group is that it has introduced philosophy in<strong>to</strong>the Party platform without stating frankly what tendencyin philosophy it advocates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!