11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210V. I. LENINblame for everything—this is the same “philosophy <strong>of</strong>his<strong>to</strong>ry” as that <strong>of</strong> Axelrod and Alexinsky.The very first paragraph <strong>of</strong> the Vienna resolution states:... “the representatives <strong>of</strong> all factions and trends ... by theirdecision [at the plenum] consciously and deliberatelyassumed responsibility for carrying out the adopted resolutionsin the present conditions, in co-operation with the givenpersons, groups and institutions”. This refers <strong>to</strong> “conflicts inthe Central Organ”. Who is “responsible for carrying out theresolutions” <strong>of</strong> the plenum in the Central Organ? Obviouslythe majority <strong>of</strong> the Central Organ, i.e., the Bolsheviksand the Poles; it is they who are responsible for carryingout the resolutions <strong>of</strong> the plenum—“in co-operation withthe given persons”, i.e., with the Golosists and Vperyodists.What does the principal resolution <strong>of</strong> the plenum sayin that part <strong>of</strong> it which deals with the most “vexed” problems<strong>of</strong> our Party, with questions which were most disputablebefore the plenum and which should have become leastdisputable after the plenum?It says that bourgeois influence over the proletariat manifestsitself, on the one hand, in rejecting the illegal Social-Democratic Party and belittling its role and importance,etc., and, on the other hand, in rejecting Social-Democraticwork in the Duma as well as the utilisation <strong>of</strong> legal possibilities,the failure <strong>to</strong> grasp the importance <strong>of</strong> both the oneand the other, etc.Now what is the meaning <strong>of</strong> this resolution?Does it mean that the Golosists should have sincerelyand irrevocably put an end <strong>to</strong> rejecting the illegal Partyand belittling it, etc., that they should have admittedthis <strong>to</strong> be a deviation, that they should have got rid <strong>of</strong> it,and done positive work in a spirit hostile <strong>to</strong> this deviation;that the Vperyodists should have sincerely and irrevocablyput an end <strong>to</strong> rejecting Duma work and legal possibilities,etc., that the majority <strong>of</strong> the Central Organ should in everyway have enlisted the “co-operation” <strong>of</strong> the Golosists andVperyodists on condition that they sincerely, consistentlyand irrevocably renounced the “deviations” described indetail in the resolution <strong>of</strong> the plenum?Or does the resolution mean that the majority <strong>of</strong> theCentral Organ is responsible for carrying out the resolutions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!