11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ELEVENTH SESSION OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST BUREAU143dealt with in one way or another, <strong>to</strong> indicate a method <strong>of</strong>settling the conflict although, <strong>of</strong> course, the majority <strong>of</strong> themembers <strong>of</strong> the Bureau must have been well aware <strong>of</strong> thereal substance <strong>of</strong> this matter, the real substance <strong>of</strong> the strugglebetween the two trends in Holland.Finally two resolutions were moved, revealing two trends.Singer in support <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Marx</strong>ists, Adler against. Singer’sread as follows:“The International Socialist Bureau resolves: the Partywhich has been formed in Holland under the name <strong>of</strong> the newS.D. Party [there is a mistake in the title: it should be “S.D.Party”], should be admitted <strong>to</strong> International Socialist Congressesas it satisfies the conditions specified in the Rules<strong>of</strong> the International. Whether it should have a delegateon the Bureau and how many votes it should have at theCongress is a question for the Copenhagen Congress <strong>to</strong> decideif the Dutch comrades themselves do not reach a settlement<strong>of</strong> the dispute.”We see from this text that Singer did not go beyond theformal aspect, leaving the final settlement <strong>of</strong> the question<strong>to</strong> the Dutch section <strong>of</strong> the international congress, but at thesame time clearly emphasising that the <strong>Marx</strong>ist party inHolland should be recognised by the International. Adlerdid not venture <strong>to</strong> say the opposite, he did not venture <strong>to</strong>declare outright that he did not consider the Dutch <strong>Marx</strong>ists<strong>to</strong> be members <strong>of</strong> the International, that he shared theattitude <strong>of</strong> the Executive Committee which flatly rejectedthe <strong>Marx</strong>ists’ application. Adler moved that “The request<strong>of</strong> the S.D.P. be referred <strong>to</strong> the Dutch section. If no agreementis reached within this section an appeal can be made<strong>to</strong> the Bureau.” The formal attitude is the same as Singer’s,but it is clear from the text that the sympathies <strong>of</strong> this resolutionare on the side <strong>of</strong> the opportunists, for it says nothingabout recognising the <strong>Marx</strong>ists as members <strong>of</strong> the International.And the voting <strong>of</strong> the resolutions made it instantlymanifest that the spirit <strong>of</strong> both one and the other had beenperfectly grasped by the members <strong>of</strong> the Bureau. Singerreceived 11 votes: from France 2 votes, Germany 2, England1 (S.D.), Argentina 2, Bulgaria 1, Russia 1 (S.D.),Poland 1 (S.D.), America 1 (the Socialist Labour Party).Adler received <strong>16</strong> votes: from England 1 (“Independent”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!