11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

189ONE OF THE OBSTACLES TO PARTY UNITYWhile the pro-Party Mensheviks in quite a number <strong>of</strong>groups abroad are rallying <strong>to</strong>gether and coming out moreand more strongly against the patently liquidationist trend <strong>of</strong>Golos Sotsial-Demokrata, the Vienna Pravda is still actingevasively. In No. 12 we find an article entitled “To Unity—Despite All Obstacles”. In this article one cannot but approvethe first, even if very timid and very incomplete, attempt<strong>to</strong> carry out the resolution <strong>of</strong> the C.C. about explainingthe danger <strong>of</strong> liquidationism. On the other hand, the whole<strong>of</strong> the first part <strong>of</strong> the article is an illustration how muchfurther from defending partyism certain alleged non-factionalSocial-Democrats are than the pro-Party Mensheviks.Here Pravda tells a downright untruth, asserting thatthe edi<strong>to</strong>rial board <strong>of</strong> the Central Organ in the articleentitled “Golos (Voice) <strong>of</strong> the Liquida<strong>to</strong>rs Against the Party”*declared the “whole agreement” <strong>to</strong> have been “disrupted”.Anyone who has read No. 12 <strong>of</strong> the Central Organ will seethat we did not say anything <strong>of</strong> the sort. The agreementwith the Mensheviks was on condition that they recognisedpartyism and sincerely, consistently renounced liquidationism.Golos Sotsial-Demokrata and a group <strong>of</strong> its followersin Russia disrupted this agreement: some, like Mikhail,Roman, Yuri, etc. in Russia, by declaring openly that theagreement itself was harmful (“the resolutions <strong>of</strong> theCentral Committee are harmful”; the very existence <strong>of</strong> theCentral Committee is harmful; there is no need <strong>to</strong> liquidatethe Party, it has been liquidated already), others, like Golos,by defending the utterances <strong>of</strong> the former. The pro-PartyMensheviks, headed by Plekhanov, rebelled against theGolosists for their violation <strong>of</strong> the agreement. If Pravda* See pp. 156-64 <strong>of</strong> this volume.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!