11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

400V. I. LENINout Russia as they were in the St. Petersburg and Warsawareas, the <strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> strikers would have been twice asmany. This conclusion can also be expressed in the followingway: the workers were able <strong>to</strong> estimate only one-half <strong>of</strong> theirstrength in this sphere <strong>of</strong> the movement, for they had notyet brought the other half in<strong>to</strong> play. In geographical terms,this may be stated as follows: the West and Northwest hadwoken up, but the Centre, the East and the South were stillhalf asleep. The development <strong>of</strong> capitalism contributessomething every day <strong>to</strong> awakening the tardy.Another important conclusion from the figures by areasis that in 1906 compared with 1905 the movement declinedeverywhere, although unevenly; in 1907 compared with 1906there was a very large decline in the Warsaw area and arather slight decline in the Moscow, Kiev and <strong>Vol</strong>ga areas,whereas in the St. Petersburg and Kharkov areas there wasan increase in the number <strong>of</strong> strikers. This means that,with the level <strong>of</strong> political consciousness and preparedness<strong>of</strong> the population as it was at the time, this particular form<strong>of</strong> the movement had exhausted itself in 1905; inasmuch asthe objective contradictions in social and political life hadnot disappeared, the movement was bound <strong>to</strong> pass <strong>to</strong> a higherform. But after a year <strong>of</strong> recuperation, as it were, or <strong>of</strong>the mustering <strong>of</strong> forces during 1906, there were signs <strong>of</strong> a newupsurge, which actually began in part <strong>of</strong> the country. Inappraising this period the liberals, echoed by the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs,speak contemptuously about “the expectations <strong>of</strong> theromanticists”; a <strong>Marx</strong>ist, however, must state that by refusing<strong>to</strong> support this partial upsurge the liberals frustratedthe last opportunity <strong>of</strong> upholding the democratic gains.As regards the terri<strong>to</strong>rial distribution <strong>of</strong> the strikers, itshould be noted that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> them is accountedfor by six gubernias with highly developed industries, andwith big cities in five <strong>of</strong> them. The six gubernias are: St. Petersburg,Moscow, Vladimir, Warsaw, Petrokov and Livonia.In 1905 there were 827,000 fac<strong>to</strong>ry workers in these gubernias,out <strong>of</strong> a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> 1,661,000; thus they accounted fornearly half <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal. As for the number <strong>of</strong> strikers in thesegubernias, there were 246,000 in all during the decade 1895-1904, out <strong>of</strong> 431,000, or about 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number<strong>of</strong> strikers; in 1905 there were 2,072,000 out <strong>of</strong> a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!