11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES OF A PUBLICIST221ing at in Otkliki Bunda when he writes: “The comradeswho are now clinging <strong>to</strong> formalities know perfectly wellhow the last plenum would have ended if it had taken aformal point <strong>of</strong> view.”In this sentence, Comrade Yonov speaks in hints. LikeTrotsky, he considers such a mode <strong>of</strong> expressing his thoughtsextremely “tactful”, non-factional and specifically pro-Party. In point <strong>of</strong> fact, this is the very method employedby sectarian diplomats which does nothing but harm <strong>to</strong> theParty and the pro-Party cause. Such hints are lost <strong>to</strong> some,pique the sectarian curiosity <strong>of</strong> others, and set <strong>of</strong>f morescandalmongering and back-biting. Hence Yonov’s hintsmust be deciphered. If he is not referring here <strong>to</strong> the plenumseeking an agreement (not merely a majority decision)on a number <strong>of</strong> questions we shall ask him <strong>to</strong> express himselfmore explicitly and not put ideas in<strong>to</strong> the heads <strong>of</strong> the gossipsabroad.If, however, Yonov is referring here <strong>to</strong> the agreementbetween the factions at the plenum, his criticism <strong>of</strong> “thecomrades who cling <strong>to</strong> formalities” vividly shows us ye<strong>to</strong>ne more trait <strong>of</strong> those alleged concilia<strong>to</strong>rs who, in effect,are secretly helping the liquida<strong>to</strong>rs.A number <strong>of</strong> unanimous resolutions were adopted at theplenum by agreement between the factions. Why was thisnecessary? Because actually the relations between the factionswere tantamount <strong>to</strong> a split and, as is always and inevitablythe case in any split, the discipline <strong>of</strong> the whole body(in this instance the Party) is sacrificed <strong>to</strong> the discipline<strong>of</strong> the part (in the present instance the faction).Party conditions in Russia being what they are therewas no other way <strong>to</strong> unity than through an agreement betweenthe factions (whether all the factions or the chiefones, whether parts <strong>of</strong> factions or whole ones, is anotherquestion). Hence, the necessity <strong>of</strong> a compromise, i.e., concessionson certain points which were not recognised by themajority but were demanded by the minority. One <strong>of</strong> theseconcessions was the deletion <strong>of</strong> the word liquidationismfrom the resolution. A particularly conspicuous sign <strong>of</strong> thecompromise character <strong>of</strong> the resolutions <strong>of</strong> the plenum wasthe Bolsheviks’ conditional surrender <strong>of</strong> their factionalproperty <strong>to</strong> third persons. One section <strong>of</strong> the Party condi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!