11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56V. I. LENINProletary, dated August 21, 1906, we find an edi<strong>to</strong>rialarticle “The Boycott” and it states in black and white: “Thetime has now come when the revolutionary Social-Democratsmust cease <strong>to</strong> be boycottists.”* Since that time there has notbeen a single issue <strong>of</strong> Proletary containing even one line <strong>of</strong>print in favour <strong>of</strong> “boycottism” (after 1906), otzovism andultimatumism, without a refutation <strong>of</strong> this caricature <strong>of</strong>Bolshevism. And now the caricature Bolsheviks are gettingon stilts and trying <strong>to</strong> compare themselves with those wh<strong>of</strong>irst fought the three-year campaign <strong>of</strong> the old Iskra andsecured the endorsement <strong>of</strong> its line by the Second PartyCongress and then exposed, the volte-face <strong>of</strong> the new Iskra!Comrade Maximov now signs himself “Former edi<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong>the popular workers’ newspaper Vperyod”, wanting <strong>to</strong> remindthe reader that it was said “geese saved Rome”. “Your relation<strong>to</strong> the policy <strong>of</strong> Vperyod,” 38 we tell Maximov in reply<strong>to</strong> this reminder, was exactly the same as Potresov’s relation<strong>to</strong> the old Iskra. Potresov was its edi<strong>to</strong>r, but he did notlead the old Iskra, the old Iskra led him. As soon as hesought <strong>to</strong> change the policy the supporters <strong>of</strong> the old Iskraturned their backs on him. And now even Potresov himself ismaking frantic efforts <strong>to</strong> blot out the “sin <strong>of</strong> his youth”, hisparticipation in the edi<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the old Iskra.Maximov did not lead Vperyod, but Vperyod led him.Pro<strong>of</strong>: the policy <strong>of</strong> boycotting the Third Duma, in support<strong>of</strong> which Vperyod did not and could not say a single word.Maximov acted very wisely and well when he allowed himself<strong>to</strong> be led by Vperyod. Now he has begun <strong>to</strong> think up (or,what comes <strong>to</strong> the same thing, <strong>to</strong> help the otzovists <strong>to</strong> thinkup) a line <strong>of</strong> policy that is inevitably leading him in<strong>to</strong> themorass, just like Potresov.Remember this, Comrade Maximov: the basis one shouldtake for comparison is the integrity <strong>of</strong> an ideological andpolitical trend, not “words” and “slogans”, which somepeople learn by heart without understanding their meaning.Bolshevism ran the old Iskra for three years, from 1900 <strong>to</strong>1903, and emerged as an integral trend for the struggle withMenshevism. The Mensheviks persisted for a long time intheir new alliance with the anti-Iskrists and the support-* See present edition, <strong>Vol</strong>. 11, p. 145.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!