11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

376V. I. LENINThis is not a slip <strong>of</strong> the pen on Mar<strong>to</strong>v’s part. It is the centralpoint <strong>of</strong> all the ideas <strong>of</strong> Menshevism. The opportunisthis<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the Russian revolution which is being publishedin Russia under the edi<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> Potresov, Mar<strong>to</strong>v and Maslov(The Social Movement in Russia at the Beginning <strong>of</strong> the TwentiethCentury) is thoroughly permeated with these ideas.The Menshevik Maslov expressed these ideas still more graphicallywhen he stated in the article which sums up this“work”: “a dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat and the peasantrywould run counter <strong>to</strong> the whole course <strong>of</strong> economic development.”It is precisely here that the roots <strong>of</strong> the divergenciesbetween Bolshevism and Menshevism must be sought.Mar<strong>to</strong>v substituted the school <strong>of</strong> the capitalist bourgeoisiefor the school <strong>of</strong> capitalism. (Let us state in parenthesis thatthere is no other bourgeoisie in the world than the capitalistbourgeoisie.) What is meant by the school <strong>of</strong> capitalism?That capitalism lifts the peasants from the idiocy <strong>of</strong> rurallife, rouses them and impels them <strong>to</strong> fight. What is meant bythe school <strong>of</strong> the “capitalist bourgeoisie”? That “the Germanbourgeoisie <strong>of</strong> 1848 is without the least compunction betrayingthe peasants, who are its most natural allies ... andwithout whom it is powerless against the nobility” (Karl<strong>Marx</strong> in Neue Rheinische Zeitung <strong>of</strong> July 29, 1848). 138 Thatthe Russian liberal bourgeoisie in 1905-07 systematicallyand persistently betrayed the peasants, that it in fact deserted<strong>to</strong> the side <strong>of</strong> the landlords and tsarism against the fightingpeasants and put direct obstacles in the path <strong>of</strong> the development<strong>of</strong> the peasant struggle.Under cover <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Marx</strong>ist” catchwords about the “education”<strong>of</strong> the peasants by capitalism, Mar<strong>to</strong>v is advocating the“education” <strong>of</strong> the peasants (who fought the nobility in revolutionaryfashion) by the liberals (who betrayed the peasants<strong>to</strong> the nobles).This is substituting liberalism for <strong>Marx</strong>ism. This is liberalismembellished with <strong>Marx</strong>ist phrases. What Bebel saidin Magdeburg about there being National Liberals among theSocial-Democrats is true not only <strong>of</strong> Germany.It is also necessary <strong>to</strong> observe that most <strong>of</strong> the ideologicalleaders <strong>of</strong> Russian liberalism were brought up on Germanliterature and are deliberately transplanting <strong>to</strong> Russia theBrentano and Sombart brand <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Marx</strong>ism”, which recognises

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!