11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES OF A PUBLICIST241when there is an acknowledged common basis in principlefor a union. The question as <strong>to</strong> who was <strong>to</strong> join this unionafter all the concessions had been made remained open atthat time; for in principle the provisional assumption wasinevitable that all the Social-Democrats would want <strong>to</strong>enter the Party, that all the Mensheviks would want loyally<strong>to</strong> carry out the anti-liquidationist resolution, and thatall the Vperyodists would want <strong>to</strong> do the same in regard<strong>to</strong> the anti-otzovist resolution.Now, however, brokers are not required; there is noplace for them, because there is no question <strong>of</strong> the extent<strong>of</strong> concessions. And this question does not arise becausethere is no question <strong>of</strong> any concessions at all. All the concessions(and even excessive ones) were made at the plenum.Now it is exclusively a question <strong>of</strong> a principled stand inthe struggle against liquidationism, moreover not againstliquidationism in general, but against a definite group<strong>of</strong> liquida<strong>to</strong>r-independents, the group <strong>of</strong> Mikhail and Co.,the group <strong>of</strong> Potresov and Co. Should Trotsky and Yonovtake it in<strong>to</strong> their heads <strong>to</strong> “reconcile” the Party with thegiven persons, groups and institutions, then we all pro-Party Bolsheviks and all pro-Party Mensheviks wouldregard them simply as trai<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the Party, and nothingmore.The concilia<strong>to</strong>r-diplomats were “strong” at the plenumexclusively because and ins<strong>of</strong>ar as both the pro-PartyBolsheviks and the pro-Party Mensheviks wanted peaceand attached subordinate importance <strong>to</strong> the question <strong>of</strong>the conditions <strong>of</strong> peace compared with-the question <strong>of</strong> theanti-liquidationist and the anti-otzovist tactics <strong>of</strong> the Party.I, for instance, considered the concessions excessive andfought over the extent <strong>of</strong> these concessions (this is hintedat by Golos in No. 19-20 and is openly stated by Yonov).But I was ready then and would be ready now <strong>to</strong> reconcilemyself even <strong>to</strong> excessive concessions, provided the line<strong>of</strong> the Party was not thereby undermined, provided theseconcessions did not lead <strong>to</strong> the negation <strong>of</strong> that line, providedthese concessions paved the way for bringing peopleback from liquidationism and otzovism <strong>to</strong> the Party. Butnow that Mikhail and Co. and Potresov and Co. have unitedand come out against the Party and against the plenum,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!