11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STRIKE STATISTICS IN RUSSIA419The conclusions that follow from these data are highlyinteresting and require a detailed examination. On thewhole, as we have seen, the success <strong>of</strong> the struggle, as far as theYears 1905 1906Quarters I II III IV I II III IVResult <strong>of</strong> strikes:In favour <strong>of</strong> the workers 158 71 45 95 34 86 37 6Compromise 267 109 61 235 28 58 46 8In favour <strong>of</strong> the employers. . . . . . 179 59 59 100 11 78 4223Total* . . . 604 239 <strong>16</strong>5 430 73 222 125 37workers are concerned, depends on the force <strong>of</strong> their onslaught.Do the data cited above confirm this conclusion? Thefirst quarter <strong>of</strong> 1905 appears <strong>to</strong> have been less favourablefor the workers than the second quarter, although in thelatter the movement was weaker. This inference would bewrong, however, since the quarterly data combine the upsurgein January (321,000 workers involved in economicstrikes) and the decline in February (228,000) and in March(56,000). If we single out January, the month <strong>of</strong> upsurge,we find that in this month the workers were vic<strong>to</strong>rious:87,000 won their strikes, 81,000 lost, and 152,000 concludeda compromise. The two months <strong>of</strong> decline (February andMarch) brought the workers defeat.The next period (the second quarter <strong>of</strong> 1905) was one <strong>of</strong>an advance, which reached its climax in May. The rise <strong>of</strong> thestruggle signified vic<strong>to</strong>ry for the workers: 71,000 won theirstrikes, 59,000 lost, and 109,000 compromised.The third period (third quarter <strong>of</strong> 1905 was one <strong>of</strong> decline.The number <strong>of</strong> strikers was much less than in the secondquarter. The decline in the force <strong>of</strong> the onslaught signifiedvic<strong>to</strong>ry for the employers: 59,000 workers lost their strikes,and only 45,000 won. The workers who lost their strikes represented35.6 per cent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal, i.e., more than in 1906.This means that the “general atmosphere <strong>of</strong> sympathy” withthe workers in 1905, which the liberals talk so much <strong>of</strong> asbeing the main cause <strong>of</strong> the workers’ vic<strong>to</strong>ries (recently* The <strong>of</strong>ficial statistics provide no monthly <strong>to</strong>tals relating <strong>to</strong> thisquestion; they had <strong>to</strong> be obtained by adding up the figures for thevarious industries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!