11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GOLOS (VOICE) OF LIQUIDATORS AGAINST THE PARTY<strong>16</strong>1edi<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> Golos against the decisions <strong>of</strong> the plenum amounts<strong>to</strong>. After the unity plenum they came out with a much moreopen and much more impudent defence <strong>of</strong> liquidationismthan prior <strong>to</strong> it. When their manifes<strong>to</strong> tells the Mensheviksthat the letter <strong>of</strong> the C.C. Bureau Abroad <strong>to</strong> thegroups, 81 which calls for the creation <strong>of</strong> real unity, wasadopted against the votes <strong>of</strong> the Menshevik and Bundistmembers <strong>of</strong> the Bureau Abroad, everyone realises that weare confronted with a poorly disguised call for non-compliancewith this letter and for disruption <strong>of</strong> unity abroad.Let the pro-Party Mensheviks who condemn the Golosistspass from condemnation <strong>to</strong> action if they want at all costs<strong>to</strong> uphold Party unity. This unity depends now on the pro-Party Mensheviks, on their readiness and ability <strong>to</strong> wage anopen fight both against the foreign and the Russian “actualcentre” <strong>of</strong> the Golosist liquida<strong>to</strong>rs.This Russian centre, the Russian M.C. (Menshevik centre)comes out plainly in Golos No. 19-20 with an “Open Letter”in which Plekhanov is declared “a liquida<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the ideas<strong>of</strong> Menshevism”. The Mensheviks’ withdrawal from the Partyis explained—it would be more correct <strong>to</strong> say, is justified—by the “universally known phenomenon <strong>of</strong> the necrosis <strong>of</strong>the Party units”!! Those who withdraw—the manifes<strong>to</strong> <strong>of</strong>the M.C. tells us—are “falsely called liquida<strong>to</strong>rs” (p. 24<strong>of</strong> Golos).We ask any Social-Democrats who are at all capable <strong>of</strong>impartiality, we ask particularly working-class Social-Democrats,irrespective <strong>of</strong> trends, whether the appearance <strong>of</strong> sucha manifes<strong>to</strong> <strong>of</strong> the M.C. on the morrow <strong>of</strong> the plenum doesnot reduce <strong>to</strong> naught the efforts for unity.We consider it our duty <strong>to</strong> inform the whole Party <strong>of</strong> thenames <strong>of</strong> those who signed this famous document, which,we are sure, will have the ill-fame attaching <strong>to</strong> the name <strong>of</strong>Herostratus: 1) Avgus<strong>to</strong>vsky, 2) An<strong>to</strong>n, 3) Vadim, 4) V. Petrova,5) Georgy, 6) Georg, 7) Yevg. Ha-az, 8) Kramolnikov,9) D. Koltsov, 10) Nat. Mikhailova, 11) Roman, 12) Romul,13) Solomonov, 14) Cherevanin (<strong>of</strong> course!), 15) Yuri,<strong>16</strong>) Y. P-y. 82“These signa<strong>to</strong>ries,” says the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board <strong>of</strong> Golos“are old Party workers, well-known <strong>to</strong> the edi<strong>to</strong>rial board;some <strong>of</strong> them have held responsible posts in the Party.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!