11.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 16 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STRIKE STATISTICS IN RUSSIA417that the weakness lay in the insufficiency <strong>of</strong> this combination,in the insufficient number <strong>of</strong> workers involved in economicstrikes. The statistical data furnish graphic confirmation<strong>of</strong> the correctness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Marx</strong>ist view, for they revealthe “general law” <strong>of</strong> the three-year period—namely, that themovement becomes intensified as a result <strong>of</strong> the intensification<strong>of</strong> the economic struggle. And there is a logical connectionbetween this “general law” and the basic features <strong>of</strong>every capitalist society, in which there always exist backwardsections which can be aroused only by the most extraordinaryaccentuation <strong>of</strong> the movement, and it is onlyby means <strong>of</strong> economic demands that the backward sectionscan be drawn in<strong>to</strong> the struggle.If we compare the upsurge in the last quarter <strong>of</strong> 1905with the one before it and the one after it, i.e., with the firstquarter <strong>of</strong> 1905 and the second quarter <strong>of</strong> 1906, we see clearlythat the upsurge in Oc<strong>to</strong>ber-December had a narrower economicbase than either the one before or the one after, i.e.,as regards the number <strong>of</strong> workers involved in economic strikesas a percentage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal number <strong>of</strong> strikers. Undoubtedly,the demand for an eight-hour day antagonised manyelements among the bourgeoisie who might have sympathisedwith the other aspirations <strong>of</strong> the workers. But there isalso no doubt that this demand attracted many elements,not <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie, who had not so far been drawn in<strong>to</strong>the movement. These elements were responsible for 430,000workers taking part in economic strikes in the last quarter<strong>of</strong> 1905, their number dropping <strong>to</strong> 73,000 in the first quarter<strong>of</strong> 1906 and increasing again <strong>to</strong> 222,000 in the second quarter<strong>of</strong> 1906. Consequently, the weakness lay not in the absence<strong>of</strong> sympathy on the part <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie, but in the insufficient,or insufficiently timely, support on the part <strong>of</strong> nonbourgeoiselements.It is in the nature <strong>of</strong> liberals <strong>to</strong> be dismayed by the factthat a movement <strong>of</strong> the kind we are discussing always antagonisescertain elements <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie. It is in the nature<strong>of</strong> <strong>Marx</strong>ists <strong>to</strong> note the fact that this kind <strong>of</strong> movementalways attracts large sections outside the ranks <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie.Suum cuique—<strong>to</strong> each his own.The <strong>of</strong>ficial statistics dealing with the results <strong>of</strong> thestrikes are highly instructive as regards the vicissitudes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!