12.07.2015 Views

THE GOD-MAN The Life, Journeys and Work of Meher Baba with an ...

THE GOD-MAN The Life, Journeys and Work of Meher Baba with an ...

THE GOD-MAN The Life, Journeys and Work of Meher Baba with an ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

396 <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GOD</strong>-<strong>MAN</strong><strong>The</strong> first M<strong>an</strong>-God, having tr<strong>an</strong>scended all material <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> temporal elements, became one <strong>with</strong> God in thebeyond <strong>with</strong>out losing what c<strong>an</strong> only be described as individuality. It was he who in God's will, which wasalso his will, descended again into the material <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> temporal for the sake <strong>of</strong> m<strong>an</strong>kind <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> became the firstGod-M<strong>an</strong>. That particular 'individuality' did not repeat the act. <strong>The</strong> next advent <strong>of</strong> God as God-M<strong>an</strong> was<strong>an</strong>other individuality <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> bore <strong>an</strong>other name. But because all who enter into complete union <strong>with</strong> God areone <strong>with</strong> each other as well as <strong>with</strong> God, those who appear as God-Men are one infinitely. 'Had he athous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> sons they must needs be the same Son', said Eckhart. <strong>The</strong>y are indistinguishable in divinity, thougheternally distinguishable in individuality, so that Zoroaster is eternally Zoroaster, Krishna Krishna, JesusChrist Jesus Christ. <strong>The</strong>y are one in divine 'nature', in the theological sense, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> in divine personality eternal:not individualized parts <strong>of</strong> a whole but each himself containing the whole. This is difficult to express, but itis what I underst<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Baba</strong> to me<strong>an</strong>. When I asked him in November 1962 if it were so, he agreed.It seems to me that here is a contribution to the doctrine <strong>of</strong> 'incarnation' <strong>of</strong> great value, though it remains amystery, intended to be such. As stated by <strong>Baba</strong>, the idea involves assumptions open to much less criticalobjection th<strong>an</strong> that contained in most theologies, while retaining the element <strong>of</strong> mystery. This may perhapsbe seen more clearly when I discuss <strong>Baba</strong>'s cosmology in the chapter on his teaching.<strong>Baba</strong> will be found to speak <strong>of</strong> the Avatar as Krishna, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, sometimes <strong>of</strong> himselfas 'when I appeared' as Krishna or Christ, which, as I have indicated, is not to be taken in a literal sense. <strong>The</strong>idea <strong>of</strong> the God-M<strong>an</strong> c<strong>an</strong>not be understood at all except as a symbol <strong>of</strong> the eternal Logos, so that everym<strong>an</strong>ifestation is unique <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> unrepeatable in the phenomenal presence <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> idiom <strong>of</strong> the age. As <strong>Baba</strong> says:Whether there have been twenty-six Avatars since Adam, or one thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> twenty-four thous<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>s <strong>of</strong>Prophets, as is sometimes claimed, or whether Jesus Christ was the last <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> only Messiah, or Muhammad thelast Prophet, is immaterial <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> insignific<strong>an</strong>t when Eternity <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> Reality are under consideration ....<strong>The</strong>se avataric presences regarded as revelations symbolizing the activity <strong>of</strong> God in phenomena me<strong>an</strong> thatincarnation is not the introduction into the body <strong>of</strong> a m<strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong> a divine principle or person, or the possession <strong>of</strong>a particular hum<strong>an</strong> ego by a divine personality, but the birth <strong>of</strong> the divine being as a m<strong>an</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!