Temperature - European Investment Bank
Temperature - European Investment Bank
Temperature - European Investment Bank
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WEST AFRICAN POWER POOL (WAPP) PÖYRY ENERGY LTD.<br />
Mount Coffee HPP ESIA and RAP 2012-09-18<br />
ESIA Report Page 228<br />
Table 29-1: Project compliance Analysis<br />
Strategic Priority Guideline Comments<br />
Strategic Priority 1: Gaining Public Acceptance<br />
Public acceptance of key decisions is essential for equitable<br />
and sustainable water and energy resources development.<br />
Acceptance emerges from recognising rights, addressing<br />
risks, and safeguarding the entitlements of all groups of<br />
affected people, particularly indigenous and tribal peoples,<br />
women and other vulnerable groups. Decision making<br />
processes and mechanisms are used that enable informed<br />
participation by all groups of people, and result in the<br />
demonstrable acceptance of key decisions. Where projects<br />
affect indigenous and tribal peoples, such processes are<br />
guided by their free, prior and informed consent.<br />
Strategic Priority 2: Comprehensive Options Assessment<br />
Alternatives to dams do often exist. To explore these<br />
alternatives, needs for water, food and energy are assessed<br />
and objectives clearly defined. The appropriate development<br />
response is identified from a range of possible options. The<br />
selection is based on a comprehensive and participatory<br />
assessment of the full range of policy, institutional and<br />
technical options. In the assessment process social and<br />
environmental aspects have the same significance as<br />
economic and financial factors. The options assessment<br />
process continues through all stages of planning, project<br />
development and operations<br />
1. Stakeholder Analysis The main stakeholders (other than those directly involved in HPP<br />
development) have been identified as the local inhabitants and NGOs active<br />
in the area. A social survey was performed and the inhabitants of the project<br />
area were informed. Household and village questionnaires as well as focus<br />
group discussions were used. Meeting with the NGOs (FAO, Bureau of<br />
Fisheries etc.) concerning the environmental issues were held and the<br />
2. Negotiated Decision-Making<br />
Process<br />
3. Free, Prior and Informed<br />
Consent<br />
Conclusions:<br />
4. Strategic Impact Assessment for<br />
Environmental, Social, Health and<br />
Cultural Heritage Issues<br />
5. Project Level Impact<br />
Assessment for Environmental,<br />
Social, Health and Cultural<br />
Heritage Issues<br />
problems discussed.<br />
The stakeholders have not participated in any decision on the Project.<br />
Structures as suggested by the guidelines are not in place. Stakeholders had<br />
the opportunity to formulate their concerns and expectations, however, these<br />
cannot yet be considered as firm parts of the project.<br />
The affected population cannot be qualified as an indigenous, tribal or ethnic<br />
minority population as defined in WB OP 4.10. They have indicated their<br />
consent with the project and listed their expectations. Agreements will have<br />
to be reached.<br />
Stakeholder Analysis was carried out (to a sufficient extent for this stage). It<br />
is now important that the process which has started successfully is being<br />
maintained and will continue. Firm agreements on requests made must be<br />
reached before a final decision on the project.<br />
A SEA for regional development cannot be made as part of an EIA for a<br />
specific project. However, based on available information a preliminary CIA<br />
of the planned cascade on the St Paul river has been carried out.<br />
These aspects are all being taken into consideration. An ESIA including a<br />
Social Survey were carried out for the Project with regard to the main<br />
points. While social and environmental aspects are of some concern, cultural<br />
heritage is not an issue in this case.<br />
6. Multi Criteria Analysis Such analyses are under way, however, so far without participation of<br />
stakeholders. Namely, an economic analysis for the project was carried out<br />
as part of the present study, which shows the benefits of the project and its<br />
advantages over possible alternatives.<br />
7. Life Cycle Assessment Is, at least to some extent, being carried out.<br />
8. Greenhouse Gas Emission Given the situation (small reservoir, high turnover of water, low risk of<br />
eutrophication) it can be said that the Project rates favourable in this respect.