01.12.2012 Views

Temperature - European Investment Bank

Temperature - European Investment Bank

Temperature - European Investment Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WEST AFRICAN POWER POOL (WAPP) PÖYRY ENERGY LTD.<br />

Mount Coffee HPP ESIA and RAP 2012-09-18<br />

ESIA Report Page 228<br />

Table 29-1: Project compliance Analysis<br />

Strategic Priority Guideline Comments<br />

Strategic Priority 1: Gaining Public Acceptance<br />

Public acceptance of key decisions is essential for equitable<br />

and sustainable water and energy resources development.<br />

Acceptance emerges from recognising rights, addressing<br />

risks, and safeguarding the entitlements of all groups of<br />

affected people, particularly indigenous and tribal peoples,<br />

women and other vulnerable groups. Decision making<br />

processes and mechanisms are used that enable informed<br />

participation by all groups of people, and result in the<br />

demonstrable acceptance of key decisions. Where projects<br />

affect indigenous and tribal peoples, such processes are<br />

guided by their free, prior and informed consent.<br />

Strategic Priority 2: Comprehensive Options Assessment<br />

Alternatives to dams do often exist. To explore these<br />

alternatives, needs for water, food and energy are assessed<br />

and objectives clearly defined. The appropriate development<br />

response is identified from a range of possible options. The<br />

selection is based on a comprehensive and participatory<br />

assessment of the full range of policy, institutional and<br />

technical options. In the assessment process social and<br />

environmental aspects have the same significance as<br />

economic and financial factors. The options assessment<br />

process continues through all stages of planning, project<br />

development and operations<br />

1. Stakeholder Analysis The main stakeholders (other than those directly involved in HPP<br />

development) have been identified as the local inhabitants and NGOs active<br />

in the area. A social survey was performed and the inhabitants of the project<br />

area were informed. Household and village questionnaires as well as focus<br />

group discussions were used. Meeting with the NGOs (FAO, Bureau of<br />

Fisheries etc.) concerning the environmental issues were held and the<br />

2. Negotiated Decision-Making<br />

Process<br />

3. Free, Prior and Informed<br />

Consent<br />

Conclusions:<br />

4. Strategic Impact Assessment for<br />

Environmental, Social, Health and<br />

Cultural Heritage Issues<br />

5. Project Level Impact<br />

Assessment for Environmental,<br />

Social, Health and Cultural<br />

Heritage Issues<br />

problems discussed.<br />

The stakeholders have not participated in any decision on the Project.<br />

Structures as suggested by the guidelines are not in place. Stakeholders had<br />

the opportunity to formulate their concerns and expectations, however, these<br />

cannot yet be considered as firm parts of the project.<br />

The affected population cannot be qualified as an indigenous, tribal or ethnic<br />

minority population as defined in WB OP 4.10. They have indicated their<br />

consent with the project and listed their expectations. Agreements will have<br />

to be reached.<br />

Stakeholder Analysis was carried out (to a sufficient extent for this stage). It<br />

is now important that the process which has started successfully is being<br />

maintained and will continue. Firm agreements on requests made must be<br />

reached before a final decision on the project.<br />

A SEA for regional development cannot be made as part of an EIA for a<br />

specific project. However, based on available information a preliminary CIA<br />

of the planned cascade on the St Paul river has been carried out.<br />

These aspects are all being taken into consideration. An ESIA including a<br />

Social Survey were carried out for the Project with regard to the main<br />

points. While social and environmental aspects are of some concern, cultural<br />

heritage is not an issue in this case.<br />

6. Multi Criteria Analysis Such analyses are under way, however, so far without participation of<br />

stakeholders. Namely, an economic analysis for the project was carried out<br />

as part of the present study, which shows the benefits of the project and its<br />

advantages over possible alternatives.<br />

7. Life Cycle Assessment Is, at least to some extent, being carried out.<br />

8. Greenhouse Gas Emission Given the situation (small reservoir, high turnover of water, low risk of<br />

eutrophication) it can be said that the Project rates favourable in this respect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!