01.12.2012 Views

Temperature - European Investment Bank

Temperature - European Investment Bank

Temperature - European Investment Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WEST AFRICAN POWER POOL (WAPP) PÖYRY ENERGY LTD.<br />

Mount Coffee HPP ESIA and RAP 2012-09-18<br />

ESIA Report Page 45<br />

The horizontal lines in the graph indicate water requirements for operating one unit at<br />

full capacity (100%, 85 m³/s) or at minimum capacity (40%, 34 m³/s), and the three<br />

values identified above for residual flow (1 = 22 m³/s, 2 = 8 m³/s, and 3 = 4 m³/s). The<br />

flow duration curves indicate water available for turbine operation under the different<br />

scenarios.<br />

It is quite obvious from this Figure that the difference in water availability is rather<br />

small between cases 2 and 3 (residual flow of 8 or 4 m³/s, respectively), but quite<br />

considerable for case 1 (22 m³/s). This is illustrated further in the following Table.<br />

Table 8-3: Consequences of applying different residual flow regimes<br />

Residual flow<br />

Exceedance time for operating one<br />

unit at (in % of time)<br />

Loss* (in days on average per year)<br />

m³/s 100% 40% for 1 @ 100% for 1 @ 40%<br />

0 83.9 92.8 0 0<br />

4 82.9 92.6 4 1<br />

8 82.3 92.2 6 2<br />

22 78.3 90.9 20 7<br />

* "Loss" here is expressed as the number of days per year during which the respective operation pattern<br />

cannot be maintained in comparison with the base case (0 m³/s); it has however to be noted that even in<br />

the basecase there are on average 59 days per year (16.1%) with a discharge of less than 85 m³/s, i.e. not<br />

enough for operating one turbine at full capacity, and 26 days (7.2%) with less than 34 m³/s.<br />

In addition, the costs of the loss in million USD and the CO2 production, if this loss of<br />

energy will have to be generated with a Thermal Power Plant using Light Fuel Diesel<br />

with an efficiency of 3.33kWh/litre (12.6kWh/gallon) is shown in following Table.<br />

For the calculation on CO2 emission it has been assumed that 1 litre of diesel contains<br />

733g of carbon, which results in the production of 2.68 kg CO2/l. With an efficiency of<br />

3.3 KWh el. per litre this would result in an emission of about 807 kg CO2 per produced<br />

MWh. Furthermore, 10 kg CO2/MWh which are generated by Hydro Power Plants have<br />

been deducted. For the calculation of cost of loss 0.45 USD/kWh (the actual tariff<br />

applied by LEC) has been used.<br />

Table 8-4: Loss in energy production assuming different residual flows<br />

Residual<br />

flow m³/s<br />

Mean annual<br />

electricity<br />

production<br />

GWh<br />

Loss<br />

GWh<br />

Loss<br />

%<br />

Value in<br />

million<br />

USD<br />

Loss in<br />

million<br />

USD<br />

CO2 emission for the<br />

replacement of the loss with<br />

diesel (TPP) [t]<br />

0 364 0 0 163.80 0 0<br />

4 360 4 1.1 162.00 1.80 3’189<br />

8 357 7 1.9 160.65 3.15 5’580<br />

16 351 13 3.6 157.95 5.85 10’363<br />

22 346 18 4.9 155.70 8.10 14’349<br />

30 340 24 6.6 153.00 10.80 19’131<br />

Source: Stanley Consultants

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!