12.07.2015 Views

Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals - Office of ...

Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals - Office of ...

Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENVIRONMENT, hOUSING, ANd MANAGEMENT4midcage (NASA 1988). Rats <strong>and</strong> mice generally prefer cages with low lightintensity (Blom et al. 1996), <strong>and</strong> albino rats prefer areas with a light intensity<strong>of</strong> less than 25 lux (Schlingmann et al. 1993a). Young mice prefer muchlower illumination than adults (Wax 1977). For animals that have beenshown to be susceptible to phototoxic retinopathy, light should be between130 <strong>and</strong> 325 lux in <strong>the</strong> room at cage level.Light intensity decreases with <strong>the</strong> square <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distance from its source.Thus <strong>the</strong> location <strong>of</strong> a cage on a rack affects <strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> light to which<strong>the</strong> animals within are exposed. Light intensity may differ as much as 80-fold in transparent cages from <strong>the</strong> top to <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> a rack, <strong>and</strong> differencesup to 20-fold have been recorded within a cage (Schlingmann et al.1993a,b). Management practices, such as rotating cage position relativeto <strong>the</strong> light source (Greenman et al. 1982) or providing animals with waysto control <strong>the</strong>ir own light exposure by behavioral means (e.g., nesting orbedding material adequate <strong>for</strong> tunneling), can reduce inappropriate lightstimulation. Variable-intensity lights are <strong>of</strong>ten used to accommodate <strong>the</strong>needs <strong>of</strong> research protocols, certain animal species, <strong>and</strong> energy conservation.However, such a system should also provide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> observation <strong>and</strong>care <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animals. Caution should be exercised as increases in daytimeroom illumination <strong>for</strong> maintenance purposes have been shown to changephotoreceptor physiology <strong>and</strong> can alter circadian regulation (NRC 1996;Reme et al. 1991; Terman et al. 1991).Noise <strong>and</strong> VibrationNoise produced by animals <strong>and</strong> animal care activities is inherent in <strong>the</strong>operation <strong>of</strong> an animal facility (Pfaff <strong>and</strong> Stecker 1976) <strong>and</strong> noise controlshould be considered in facility design <strong>and</strong> operation (Pekrul 1991). Assessment<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential effects <strong>of</strong> noise on an animal warrants consideration <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> intensity, frequency, rapidity <strong>of</strong> onset, duration, <strong>and</strong> vibration potential<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sound <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> hearing range, noise exposure history, <strong>and</strong> sound effectsusceptibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species, stock, or strain. Similarly, occupational exposureto animal or animal care practices that generate noise may be <strong>of</strong> concern <strong>for</strong>personnel <strong>and</strong>, if <strong>of</strong> sufficient intensity, may warrant hearing protection.Separation <strong>of</strong> human <strong>and</strong> animal areas minimizes disturbances to bothhuman <strong>and</strong> animal occupants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility. Noisy animals, such as dogs,swine, goats, nonhuman primates, <strong>and</strong> some birds (e.g., zebra finches),should be housed away from quieter animals, such as rodents, rabbits, <strong>and</strong>cats. Environments should be designed to accommodate animals that makenoise ra<strong>the</strong>r than resorting to methods <strong>of</strong> noise reduction. Exposure to soundlouder than 85 dB can have both auditory <strong>and</strong> nonauditory effects (Fletcher1976; Peterson 1980)—<strong>for</strong> example, eosinopenia, increased adrenal gl<strong>and</strong>weights, <strong>and</strong> reduced fertility in rodents (Geber et al. 1966; Nayfield <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!