02.12.2012 Views

The role of informal microfinance institutions in saving

The role of informal microfinance institutions in saving

The role of informal microfinance institutions in saving

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and bank balances which have been over 30% for three years. Oketch et al (1997:29) one<br />

could argue that this <strong>in</strong>dicates poor <strong>in</strong>vestment decisions. Of course care must be taken on<br />

decid<strong>in</strong>g the type <strong>of</strong> current assets to <strong>in</strong>vest. Treasury bills and time deposits are worthy<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments ventures for f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong> although hardly <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with their prime<br />

objectives.<br />

Earn<strong>in</strong>gs Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs analysis for the 14 branches is highly affected by the huge provisions for doubtful<br />

loans. Seven out <strong>of</strong> the n<strong>in</strong>e National Bank <strong>of</strong> Commerce (NBC) branches had Return on<br />

Assets (ROA) Total be<strong>in</strong>g zero or less respectively. <strong>The</strong> ROA among CRDB branches was<br />

slightly better but less than ten percent. CRDB Hai was a new branch and by the end <strong>of</strong> 1996<br />

was not break<strong>in</strong>g even. <strong>The</strong> ROA cont<strong>in</strong>ued to worsen over three years on average among<br />

the NGO’s. By 1996 only Gatsby had a positive ROA <strong>of</strong> 30% result<strong>in</strong>g from grant given. ROA<br />

is also poor <strong>in</strong> SACCOs averag<strong>in</strong>g less than 5%’’ (Oketch et al, 1997, p.31). Return on Assets<br />

(ROA) measures returns on assets before <strong>in</strong>terests and taxes. <strong>The</strong> higher positive percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

ROA reflects better, efficiency and effective utilization <strong>of</strong> capital. Less return on assets suggests<br />

poor performance and possibly loss mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong>.<br />

Moreover, ROA is not the only measure <strong>of</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong> performance. Oketch (1bid)<br />

analysis would have been more useful if other f<strong>in</strong>ancial performance ratios such as return on<br />

equity, current ratio, debt-equity ratio and possibly Z-score could be applied.<br />

However, it is important that most <strong>of</strong> micro f<strong>in</strong>ance f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong> <strong>in</strong> Tanzania are not<br />

utiliz<strong>in</strong>g assets effectively and efficiently. For f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitution zero and negative ROA<br />

erodes customers’ confidence. Investors prefer to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong> which can utilize their<br />

resources better. CRDB seems to have done better <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> ROA criteria. Probably, this is<br />

because CRDB started earlier to reform its operations and structure.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong> <strong>in</strong> Tanzania must improve their performance <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>crease overall<br />

efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> assets utilization. <strong>The</strong> action taken by different <strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions</strong><br />

simply to close down loss mak<strong>in</strong>g branches does not solve the cause <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!