13.07.2015 Views

Principles of naval engineering - Historic Naval Ships Association

Principles of naval engineering - Historic Naval Ships Association

Principles of naval engineering - Historic Naval Ships Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRINCIPLES OF NAVAL ENGINEERINGenergy which is transferred by the action <strong>of</strong> aforce through a distance, orwhereE .FD^wk =F X D= work, in foot pounds= force, in pounds= distance (or displacement), in feetIn the case <strong>of</strong> work done against gravity, theforce is numerically the same as the weight <strong>of</strong>the object or body that is being displaced.It is important to note that no work is doneunless something is displaced from its previousposition. When we lift a 5-pound weight fromthe floor to a table that is 3 feet high, we havedone 15 foot-pounds <strong>of</strong> work. If we merely standand hold the 5-pound weight, we do not performany work in the technical sense <strong>of</strong> the term, eventhough we may feel like we are working. In thiscase, actually, all we are doing is exerting forcein order to support the weight against the action<strong>of</strong> the force <strong>of</strong> gravity. The forces are balanced;there is no motion or displacement <strong>of</strong> the weight,so no work is done.If the force and the displacement are neitheracting in the same direction nor acting in totalopposition, work is done only by that component<strong>of</strong> the force which is acting in the direction <strong>of</strong>the displacement <strong>of</strong> the body or object. A manpushing a lawnmower, for example, is exertingsome force that acts in the direction in whichthe lawnmower is moving; but he is also exertingsome force which acts downward, at rightangles to the direction <strong>of</strong> displacement. In thiscase, only the forward component <strong>of</strong> the exertedforce results in work— that is, in the forwardmotion <strong>of</strong> the lawnmower.Suppose that we move an object in such a waythat it returns to its original position. Have wedone work or haven't we? Let us consider againthe example <strong>of</strong> lifting a 5-pound weight to thetop <strong>of</strong> a 3-foot table. By this act ion we have performed15 foot-pounds <strong>of</strong> work. Now supposethat we let the weight fall back to the floor, sothat it ends up in the same position it had originally.Displacement is zero, so work must bezero. But what has happened to the 15 foot-pounds<strong>of</strong> work we put into the system when we liftedthe weight to the top <strong>of</strong> the table? By doing thiswork, we gave the system 15 foot-pounds <strong>of</strong>mechanical potential energy. When the weightfell back to the floor, the mechanical potentialenergy was converted into mechanical kineticenergy. In one sense, therefore, we say thatour work was "undone" and that no net workhas been done.On the other hand, we may choose to regardthe two actions separately. In such a case, wesay that we have done 15 foot-pounds <strong>of</strong> work bylifting the weight and that the force <strong>of</strong> gravityacting upon the weight has done 15 foot-pounds<strong>of</strong> work to return the weight to its original positionon the floor. However, we must regard onework as positive and the other as negative. Thetwo cancel each other out, so there is again nonet work. But in this case we have recognizedthat 15 foot-pounds <strong>of</strong> work were performedtwice, in two separate operations, by two differentagencies.This example has been elaborated at somelength because we may draw several importantinferences from it. First, it may help to clarifythe concept <strong>of</strong> work as a form <strong>of</strong> energy thatmust be accounted for. Also, it may help toconvey the real meaning <strong>of</strong> the statement thatwork is mechanical energy in transition. Workis energy in transition because it occurs onlytemporarily, between other forms <strong>of</strong> energy, andbecause it must always begin and end as storedenergy. And finally, the example suggests theneed for arbitrary reference planes in connectionwith the measurement <strong>of</strong> potential energy,kinetic energy, and work. The quantitativeconsideration <strong>of</strong> any form <strong>of</strong> energy requires aframe <strong>of</strong> reference which defines the startingpoint and the stopping point <strong>of</strong> any particularoperation; the reference planes are practicallyalways relative rather than absolute.Note that mechanical potential energy, mechanicalkinetic energy, and work are allmeasured in the same unit, the foot-pound. Onefoot-pound <strong>of</strong> work is done when a force <strong>of</strong> 1pound acts through a distance <strong>of</strong> 1 foot. Onefoot-pound <strong>of</strong> mechanical kinetic energy or 1foot-pound <strong>of</strong> mechanical potential energy isthe amount <strong>of</strong> energy that would be required toaccomplish 1 foot-pound <strong>of</strong> work.The amount <strong>of</strong> work done has nothing to dowith the length <strong>of</strong> time required to do it. If aweight <strong>of</strong> 1 pound is lifted through a distance<strong>of</strong> 1 foot, 1 foot-pound <strong>of</strong> work has been done,regardless <strong>of</strong> whether it was done in half asecond or half an hour. The rate at which workis done is called power. In the field <strong>of</strong> mechanical<strong>engineering</strong>, the horsepower (hp) is thecommon unit <strong>of</strong> measurement for power. By160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!