ECONOMY

424 interpersonal comparisons of well-being
Harsanyi, J.1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maskin, E.1978. A theorem on utilitarianism. Review of Economic Studies, 45: 93–6.
Milnor, J. 1954. Games against nature. Pp. 49–59 in Decision Processes, ed. R. Thrall,
C. Coombs, and R. Davis. New York: Wiley.
Mongin, P.1994. Harsanyi’s aggregation theorem: multi-profile version and unsettled questions.
Social Choice and Welfare, 11: 331–54.
Roberts, K.1980a. Possibility theorems with interpersonally comparable welfare levels. Review
of Economic Studies, 47: 409–20.
1980b. Interpersonal comparability and social choice theory. Review of Economic Studies,
47: 421–39.
Sen,A.1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
1974. Informational bases of alternative welfare approaches: aggregation and income
distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 3: 387–403.
1977. On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis.
Econometrica, 45: 1539–72.
1979. Personal utilities and public judgements: or what’s wrong with welfare economics?.
Economic Journal, 89: 537–58.
1986. Social choice theory. Pp. 1073–181 in The Handbook of Mathematical Economics,vol.
iii, ed. K. Arrow and M. Intriligator. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Suppes,P.1966. Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese, 6: 284–306.
Weymark, J. 1991. A reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen debate on utilitarianism.
Pp. 255–320 in Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, ed. J. Elster and J. Roemer.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1993. Harsanyi’s social aggregation theorem and the weak Pareto principle. Social Choice
and Welfare, 10: 209–22.
1994. Harsanyi’s social aggregation theorem with alternative Pareto principles. Pp. 869–87
in Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, ed. W. Eichhorn. Berlin: Springer.
1995. Further remarks on Harsanyi’s social aggregation theorem and the weak Pareto
principle. Social Choice and Welfare, 12: 87–92.