27.12.2015 Views

AllatRa by Anastasia Novykh 2 www.allatra.org

AllatRa_Anastasia_Novykh_en

AllatRa_Anastasia_Novykh_en

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>AllatRa</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Anastasia</strong> <strong>Novykh</strong><br />

existing theories and assumptions, it has not been ascertained why some particles have<br />

mass while others don’t. Earlier, before I got more interested in this subject, I also took<br />

mass for granted, as some characteristic of any material object. Everyone understands<br />

that the elephant is heavier than the fly, so the mass of the elephant is bigger. However,<br />

it turned out that, once we dive into the microcosm, not all is smooth sailing here.<br />

Scientists have ascertained that there are particles which they call “elementary”, with<br />

zero mass. One of such massless representatives (in rest state) is the known to all<br />

photon, the quantum of light.<br />

Rigden: Indeed, science cannot yet answer this question because it is limited only <strong>by</strong> the<br />

theories offered. And these theories, despite the tendency to become more complex, still<br />

cannot provide reliable answers to such important questions concerning the deeper<br />

understanding of workings of the Universe as, for instance: “What exactly gives mass to<br />

these or those particles?”, “Why do masses of particles differ?”<br />

It is considered that mass of the body directly depends on the substance which it<br />

contains and which consists of atoms. But what makes the basis of atoms? According to<br />

modern conceptions, atoms consist of electrons, protons, and neutrons. It is assumed that<br />

protons and neutrons are formed from quarks. And it is electrons and quarks that are<br />

regarded as truly elementary particles <strong>by</strong> people…<br />

<strong>Anastasia</strong>: Yes, to suppose is not to dispose. This is the eternal “I believe – I don’t<br />

believe” game of the logic of the inhabitant of a three-dimensional space: what I cannot<br />

see with the equipment which is currently available does not exist in principle.<br />

Rigden: Every person has his own way of knowing the Truth, sometimes through<br />

overcoming numerous trials and errors. However, the purity of thoughts and the<br />

flexibility of mind allow a true scientist to have a broader view of the world and remove<br />

the imposed patterns. The question is not in the Knowledge but in the person’s<br />

perception.<br />

<strong>Anastasia</strong>: The funniest thing is that, once you look impartially at the theoretical<br />

descriptions of behaviours of elementary particles, which were proposed over the last<br />

hundred years, you get the impression that every next theory is trying to cover the gaps<br />

3<br />

<strong>www</strong>.<strong>allatra</strong>.<strong>org</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!