22.06.2016 Views

cities

SoCR16%20Main%20Report%20online

SoCR16%20Main%20Report%20online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 51 of the Municipal Systems Act requires a municipality to be responsive, service oriented and<br />

performance driven and to establish working political-administrative relationships and well-organised<br />

and efficient delivery systems. These requirements are reinforced in most local government legislation,<br />

including the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) (No. 56 of 2003), the Municipal Property<br />

Rates Act (No. 6 of 2004) and the Division of Revenue Act, which annually sets the intergovernmental<br />

fiscal transfers limits (de Visser, 2009). These Acts define the shape, form and functions of city governance.<br />

A council led by an executive mayor governs the city. A speaker (elected by the council) chairs the<br />

council, and a municipal manager (appointed by the council) runs the administration. Councils are<br />

expected to plan, adopt policies and engage communities (de Visser, 2010a). The municipal executive<br />

initiates policy, oversees the administration and takes regular decisions. Ward committees ensure formal<br />

(but not substantive) community participation. The IDP, which is decided with local communities, enables<br />

the coordination of the work of all three government spheres, while also including the private sector, civil<br />

society and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Ward committees and stakeholder associations –<br />

social workers, community-based organisations (CBOs), non-governmental organisations and other<br />

resource persons – together make up the IDP Representative Forum.<br />

Cities are at the coalface of participatory governance and transformation, and have to deal with a<br />

regime of complex regulations, compliance requirements and policies, from land-use management<br />

systems and environmental impact assessments, to public private partnerships (PPPs). Implementation<br />

is immensely complex, given the spatial and long-term development planning demands, incentives and<br />

regulatory frameworks, the redistributive rating systems and the restructured tax regimes that are all<br />

needed to transform the historically skewed spatial delivery patterns of <strong>cities</strong>.<br />

Although <strong>cities</strong> have set up the structures and systems required to adhere to the prescribed rule of<br />

law, they have limited human and financial resources for implementing the complex laws, regulations<br />

and demands. This can be seen in the challenges related to the devolution of housing and public<br />

transport. The overload of national policy and legislative interventions has “the unintended<br />

consequence of breeding instability and a lack of confidence in and among local government politicians,<br />

practitioners and communities” (George and Baatjies, 2015: 16).<br />

Figure 6.3: Strategies to accelerate transformation<br />

2009<br />

Local Government<br />

Turnaround Strategy<br />

2011<br />

NDP Ch.13<br />

Building a capable<br />

and developmental<br />

state<br />

2013<br />

Spatial Planning<br />

and Land Use<br />

Management Act<br />

(SPLUMA)<br />

2014<br />

Back to Basics return<br />

to compliance<br />

2016<br />

Integrated Urban<br />

Development<br />

Framework<br />

206 State of South African Cities Report 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!