22.06.2016 Views

cities

SoCR16%20Main%20Report%20online

SoCR16%20Main%20Report%20online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The promulgation of SPLUMA presents some important opportunities for <strong>cities</strong> to plan more<br />

effectively for transformative outcomes.<br />

• SPLUMA as a transformative tool: SPLUMA provides certainty to new and existing<br />

property investors through clear and effective planning processes. Planning tools include<br />

informal uses within the town planning schemes and provide a clear vision with<br />

appropriate detail as to how the city intends to develop its built environment. The SDF will<br />

be the key tool for defining the intended form of the city (SACN, 2015a), as it can identify<br />

areas of priority for development and the type of land use, as well as propose residential<br />

densities. SPLUMA brings legislative legitimacy to SDFs, which will need to be drafted<br />

carefully because decisions made based on SDFs will have to withstand legal challenges.<br />

• Effective LUMS: In addition to the SDFs, the LUMS and associated tools will be critical<br />

for achieving spatial transformation, and LUMS will need to be closely aligned to the<br />

SDFs. For the first time, <strong>cities</strong> have a single land-use management scheme that<br />

considers both informal and formal uses.<br />

• Implementation of SPLUMA: Municipalities will have to employ more planning<br />

professionals, and there will be a period of adjustment while municipalities, provinces,<br />

developers, homeowners and residents get used to the implications of the new Act.<br />

The Act’s success will depend on the extent to which residents comply and whether<br />

the development management mechanisms for addressing undesirable development<br />

will be sufficient. The implementation of SPLUMA could also be derailed by provincial<br />

and national sector departments that refuse to recognise the primacy of local<br />

government in making land development decisions.<br />

2<br />

Human settlements<br />

The provision of housing in South Africa is considered one of the most significant and important<br />

projects in “redressing our inheritance, deconstructing the socio-spatial economic incoherence, and<br />

reframing for more socially just outcomes” (Vawda, 2014: xiii). The White Paper on Housing (DoH,<br />

1994) sets out the framework for housing, and “the establishment of viable, socially and economically<br />

integrated communities, situated in areas allowing convenient access to economic opportunities as<br />

well as health, educational and social amenities” (DoH, 1994: 19).<br />

Various Constitutional Court cases have tested the housing policy and affected in particular the role of<br />

local government. The most recent and far-reaching of these was the 2011 Blue Moonlight judgement, 14<br />

where the Court ruled that the state (and local government, in particular) was responsible for finding<br />

alternative accommodation for people evicted from not only state property but also private property.<br />

This case will have critical implications for broader city and human settlement planning, as well as for<br />

financial planning at the local level (Joseph and Karuri-Sebina, 2014).<br />

14 City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Blue Moonlight Properties 39 (Pty) Ltd and Another (CC) [2011] ZACC 33; 2012 (2) BCLR 150<br />

(CC); 2012 (2) SA 104 (CC) (1 December 2011)<br />

THE SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF SOUTH AFRICA’S CITIES 65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!