22.06.2016 Views

cities

SoCR16%20Main%20Report%20online

SoCR16%20Main%20Report%20online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proactive leadership<br />

Stabilising<br />

innovation<br />

Public transport renaissance<br />

Faster, more convenient and more<br />

efficient public transport system<br />

integrating minibus taxis and other<br />

modes supersedes private car<br />

Brave new mobility<br />

Flexible door-to-door multiple mode<br />

mobility system emerges based on<br />

vehicle sharing organised via smart<br />

digital platforms displacing private<br />

car and public transit<br />

Mobility thrombosis<br />

Perpetuation of current transport patterns slowly strangles mobility for private<br />

and public modes in <strong>cities</strong> generating increased transport conflicts and costs<br />

Disruptive<br />

innovation<br />

2<br />

Reactive leadership<br />

A phased incremental approach to reform would focus initially on creating stability and<br />

putting in place a solid platform for improvement, including the following:<br />

• Establishing sound and inclusive national and metropolitan processes for engagement<br />

and consultation about public transport, including minibus taxi services.<br />

• Sorting out regulations and ensuring a functioning licensing system and consistent<br />

enforcement based on clear rules and procedures.<br />

• Improving existing minibus taxi services through partnerships and using mobile phone<br />

applications as an important enabler.<br />

• Creating space for experimentation, including piloting transformative projects on key<br />

routes, such as giving minibus taxis access to dedicated lanes and introducing ICT tools<br />

to enhance tracking and accountability.<br />

• Conducting research into optimal institutional and contracting models for public<br />

transport going forward.<br />

Source: SACN (2015c)<br />

Transforming the Built Environment of Cities<br />

The experience of urbanisation in South Africa since 1994 shows that truly transforming <strong>cities</strong>, in the<br />

sense of providing disadvantaged black families with full rights to the city and its opportunities, requires<br />

more than simply delivering shelter. Urban spatial policy should be “about opening and expanding access<br />

to the benefits of living in towns and <strong>cities</strong>”, and access should be “the key objective of spatial transformation<br />

as it most directly links spatial policy to key national objectives of eliminating poverty and reducing<br />

inequality” (Harrison and Todes, 2014: 3). The state-subsidised housing programme has to be delinked<br />

from urban access to land because the housing programme alone cannot tackle the extent of the housing<br />

challenge (Charlton, 2008). Furthermore, the post-apartheid city is characterised by informality and<br />

complexity, which cannot be dealt with through a spatial planning and land-use management system<br />

based on notions of an orderly city (ibid). Therefore, the administrative and institutional arrangements<br />

governing urban areas need to be transformed in order to be able to deal with the challenges in <strong>cities</strong>.<br />

THE SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF SOUTH AFRICA’S CITIES 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!