28.02.2019 Views

RVCC 2019 NECHE Self-Study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oards and clinical/practicum preceptors assist with evaluation of programmatic<br />

effectiveness. Input from individual advisory boards, as well as information that Program<br />

Directors glean from their participation in community boards and professional<br />

organizations also helps to inform the evaluation process.<br />

The new co-requisite math project has also undergone regular evaluation via surveys<br />

deployed to both instructors and students. Since Fall of 2017, feedback from instructor<br />

and student surveys has been gathered following each semester. Changes made to the<br />

co-requisite math courses since this time, based on student and instructor feedback<br />

include: the elimination of requiring the iLearn software in the Statistics I course (it is now<br />

optional at the request of both students and instructor feedback); labs are now attached<br />

directly to a lecture course as opposed to being open to students from multiple sections;<br />

and lab courses are taught by the same instructors that teach the lecture sections (a direct<br />

request from students).<br />

One clear example that has been implemented in evaluation and planning of academic<br />

programming relates directly to enrollment and the delivery of courses. Word of mouth<br />

feedback from advisors revealed students’ concerns regarding <strong>RVCC</strong>’s pattern of course<br />

cancellations of under-enrolled sections. This led to a Catch-22 in that students waited to<br />

enroll in courses, but courses would be cancelled due to under-enrollment. Beginning in<br />

Fall of 2017, the Department Chair of Liberal Arts started focusing much more on<br />

scheduling based on utilization of enrollment data. By evaluating tallies for the previous<br />

three corresponding semesters, and evaluating student enrollment at each Academic<br />

Center (Figure 2.2), the Chair was able to see patterns of registration and to identify<br />

sections of courses that filled, and sections that traditionally did not.<br />

While this data was evaluated based on each location, the goal of this process was to<br />

create a college-wide schedule of Liberal Arts electives that met the needs of all students<br />

and programs, prevented overlap of courses in the two closest locations (Claremont and<br />

Lebanon) unless both sections could fill, and decrease duplication of face to face and online<br />

21 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!