I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

9flo of the total rBponses oflhe fout-point sale qu.stioL Thtu i5 in
reaard! to the 6rsl qu€stion of wheth€r the sMcnts liken dte ncw
aDDroach o. not. The same ;s aLnost t re to the @ining 10
Cuestiom ;n the sane table and to rhe otber two schoob. The
diferences between the t<strong>hr</strong>ce s.hools are too slight !o be cof<strong>tn</strong>€nled
d A detailed oelamrioa is gii<strong>tn</strong> in tlE st scclioo [6.2]
S.t b, Poditive Rarult of qslioDDrire
K H
Cood rar, of rehi.s; h b.t! 42 .19
'bddcdtjqe
z Smd.ds m b@h!d i. th. Ei,8 Ftivilies 22 .ll J5
l Sffi fl@riecd ro deDad on thAg!$! I3 22 20
Foec
orr*ung p-*t . uoriog t7 l9 l6
5 S-nraearc*ourarcabseoeltsh 8 20 l0
6 Te.ni@ is slow .!d sl@ln 1 9 5
9 9
8 SruiLnts tod @d @i.q bv thdslG 5
9 T.ehcr @s 6r .I *ud€a 8
l0 T.achn flRs h.lD ad $pFo<strong>rt</strong> 5 l0 6
ll TIE( is r wi.ry oadiviries 5
t2 T*h.r esbi6 h 3iropk Engli{' l0 I
l3 T@bd ca6 for nerEs @e $e gt?'4q4{ 6 l
Th. sludds @ aI &dite 2
l5 Tl|e 3ludenls e gi6 chaE lo clEos l
This rea.hd m a lw wy of l@<strong>tt</strong>na
2
ll 2 2
l8 T.e!d .hcfi nfotdbtr Eon q!&nis 7 5
l9 Th! rrbod tr,DDEehJ 6e6 $dcnrr' Dedr I 2
z0 RolcDbY drM$ ha b.a inteFning
2l studdrs fe€l th.y s lr€al€d 4 bu@ b€bss 2
2t rsbd do6 mt irErfd <strong>rt</strong>ldd bn 2
"tE 23 sodats e mr .Ad to @ke djsd6 0 5
t4 Teh.r 6lbw @ l! ho@ s<strong>rt</strong> 2
25 GouD m<strong>rt</strong> ..livity i! u5.d 5
^bb
r.ddi K= KMi, H. lLiL A= A4 S.' t'd6l
Table (1o) lbove, contaid dlc positi\e Hponses oftF oPene
€d qBtion (3ct b) of tlE $slioMirc. Th€ qEsiidn th,t wa
alked ws: Dention the positive and negative slP.cls abo<strong>tn</strong> lhc
teachins of this util? Casting a took at the 25 itcms listed in the
table, gives us a Sencral impression rhat the majority oflhe stud€nt!