28.01.2013 Views

I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

I I|GSF hr tt.l.rt!.t tn.!. tr tlltbi - Higher Education Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

leaming is sen a! a process in which the le3mers ule what<br />

knowledgp and skills th€y have in order !o make selse of th€ flow<br />

of new infomtion. Leaming is thercfore an inlernal process, whjch<br />

cruially depeDds upon the loowledge the leahers alHdy have,<br />

and lhen abiliry and motivarion ro ur. it (Hutchinson &<br />

waters.l9E7). lf mirS a laDguagc accordioS to l€lM{dieEd<br />

apprcaches is unlike the t'adnional concept as a rnast€.in8 of a<br />

body of k'owl.dse, bu 6 acquisitioD or as a proceis of a.4uirins<br />

skills rather than a body of knowledge. It also musl be made cled<br />

{hat le3mer-centered proponents arc less int€rested iD le!D6<br />

acquiring the totality of the languag€ rh"n in assilting lhd Sain the<br />

cffmrmjcatjve linguistic stils tEy n€€d to carry od r€ l world<br />

tasks (N'll@. 1989: 22). If this is the min conc€m of largu.g€<br />

leuirg then language ieaching should be no more the hcilit ting<br />

lhis kDd ofacquisnion to |2le pl.ce. LanAuge tcehDg r no more<br />

look€d at as th€ rNmision of thal body of kmwledge bln rat|€r<br />

th€ activities thar m6t fa.ilit te languag€ lcahing in rhe abov€<br />

serue. 'Ihis Equires the rec$sideEtio<strong>tr</strong> of lhe rcle of €Iror<br />

conection and the flEncy accumcy/con{lict. The tEinees a.e to be<br />

awe th.t if language is N or cotmEicatio4 thm IlEncy is to<br />

b€ aimed al- If fluency is 1o be encou"ged lher corr€€tion husr be<br />

hinimized because it cr€at€s obs<strong>tr</strong>cl€s !o dle learners and thB<br />

hinden real conununicatior This is empba3ized by Nalarco who<br />

says, !' Ifierv€ntion ed frequent @rection intmpr nanual<br />

larguge dd ue and dis<strong>tr</strong>act fron the n€ssage" CNalNo in Adhu<br />

1988: 3). in odEr wo.A, things should so just as dley are ir rcal<br />

life wh€r. interloculors are concerFrd more for fte messsge<br />

<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>tn</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>€aningl rath€r than for th€ form Grammar or s<strong>tr</strong>u.rw}<br />

Nev€nheless <strong>tr</strong>airers should be aware of being rcalistic and that<br />

tbey have !o lmw what, when and how ,o cor€ct. TIle followinS<br />

points should b€ prn in mind wh.n dealing with $e ares of emr<br />

The most impo<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>anl mistakes re those that a<strong>tr</strong>ect rneanirg<br />

CoEect lirguistics foms sE of ro use if they do not mear<br />

c. When we talk to pcopl., being politc k mc inpo<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>rt</s<strong>tr</strong>ong>ant<br />

lhan beins lirguistically cone.r.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!